Carnets de Géologie / Notebooks on Geology: Memoir 2005/02, Abstract 07 (CG2005_M02/07)

Click here to close the window!

Contents

[Introduction] [The East European Platform (EEP)] [The Siberian Platform] [Conclusions] [Bibliographic references]  and ... [FigurES]


Diversity and distribution of Cambrian acritarchs
from the Siberian and East-European platforms -
a generalized scheme

[Diversité et distribution des acritarches du Cambrien des plates-formes sibérienne et européenne de l'Est - un modèle général]

Elena Raevskaya

Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology, Russian Academy of Sciences (IGGD RAN), Makarova emb., 2, 199034 Saint-Petersburg (Russia)
Manuscript online since December 31, 2005

Click here to download the PDF version!

Citation

Raevskaya E. (2005).- Diversity and distribution of Cambrian acritarchs from the Siberian and East-European platforms - a generalized scheme. In: Steemans P. & Javaux E. (eds.), Pre-Cambrian to Palaeozoic Palaeopalynology and Palaeobotany.- Carnets de Géologie / Notebooks on Geology, Brest, Memoir 2005/02, Abstract 07 (CG2005_M02/07)

Key Words

Acritarchs; Cambrian; East-European Platform; Siberian Platform; East-European and Siberian platforms.

Mots-Clefs

Acritarches ; Cambrien ; plate-forme européenne de l'Est ; plate-forme sibérienne ; plates-formes européenne de l'Est et sibérienne.

Back to Top!

Introduction

The study of acritarchs in Russia was initiated by Naumova and Timofeev in the early 50s. Their initial results showed the high potential of these microfossils for biostratigraphy and was followed by a remarkable degree of research activity in the 70s-80s. During a period of more than 50 years a great quantity of material was collected from different regions of Russia and especially from the two platforms: Siberian and East-European. However, in contrast to the East-European Platform material which provided comprehensive data for the high resolution biostratigraphy for the all three Cambrian Series, data from the Siberian Platform did not furnish comparable results. The present work is intended to clarify this situation and to draw up a general scheme of acritarch distribution for the whole of the Cambrian in both regions.

Published data and information available from unpublished scientific reports on Cambrian microfossils from Russia and from former Soviet territories have been combined here (Fig. 1.A ).

The East-European Platform (EEP)

Acritarchs from the Cambrian of the EEP are well studied (Timofeev, 1959; Volkova, 1973, 1983, 1990, Volkova et alii, 1979; Paškevičienė, 1980 and many others). They are rather abundant and well preserved in siliciclastic sequences of clays, siltstones and sandstones (Fig. 1.B ) throughout the entire Cambrian succession. The best studied sections are from the Moscow syneclise (Yaroslavl' region), from the north (Vologda, Arkhangelsk regions) and northwest (St.-Petersburg, Pskov, Kaliningrad regions) of Russia, from the Baltic States, from Belorussia and from Volyno-Podoliya of the Ukraine (Fig. 1.A ). Although acritarch bearing strata in some sequences are separated by depositional breaks and come from discrete areas it is possible to draw up a succession of 15 consecutive assemblages correlative with the trilobite zonation of Baltica (Volkova, 1973, 1990; Volkova et alii, 1979; Volkova & Kir'janov, 1995; Jankauskas & Lendzion, 1992). Four assemblages are distinguished in the Lower Cambrian, four are recognized in the Middle Cambrian and seven acritarch assemblages are differenciated in the Upper Cambrian (Fig. 2 ). Although the succession is incomplete it is the most informative representation of phytoplankton evolution for the entire Cambrian.

The oldest Cambrian acritarch assemblage differs little taxonomically from the Vendian representatives. Generally, small, morphologically simple sphaeromorph acritarchs in association with filamentous cyanophyta are present here. The base of the Early Cambrian is recognized by the appearance of two characteristic forms Granomarginata and Leiomarginata. Definite change in the content of phytoplankton communities is related to the appearance of diverse acanthomorph acritarchs at the level of the first appearance of trilobites. Several new genera, such as Skiagia, Baltisphaeridium (as Globosphaeridium and Heliosphaeridium), Multiplicisphaeridium, Estiastra and some others appear first during the Early Cambrian. In order to determine the true extent of both species diversity and evolutionary trends in the Early Cambrian acritarchs of Russia a serious systematic revision is needed. With the exception of the basal Early Cambrian, none of the filamentous algae, fungi and other microorganisms characteristic of the Precambrian microfossil communities are present in younger Cambrian acritarch assemblages.

Most of Early Cambrian taxa, including Skiagia disappear in the Middle Cambrian. They are replaced by herkomorph acritarchs which became dominant components in subsequent phytoplankton assemblages. Adara, Eliasum, Cristallinium, Dictyotidium, Retisphaeridium and Timofeevia are the most common genera. More than 40 acritarch species have been identified at the base of the Middle Cambrian (Volkova, 1990).

Diversity and abundance of phytoplankton continue to increase gradually during the Late Cambrian. Here, the number of identified taxa is at least four times greater than that of the Middle Cambrian. The first triangular forms and forms with large openings (Cymatiogalea, Stelliferidium) occur in the the lower-middle part of the Upper Cambrian. The last portion of the Upper Cambrian is characterized by a great number of morphological varieties in acritarchs, especially those with bipolar ornamentation (Acanthodiacrodium, Actinotodissus, Arbusculidium, Dasydiacrodium, Lophodiacrodium, Schizodiacrodium, Dicrodiacrodium, Buchinia, Ladogella, Nellia, Lusatia, Ooidium and Trunculumarium). Other genera such as Impluviculus, Vulcanisphaera, Saharidia, Elenia, Calyxiella, Izhoria and many others also characterize upper Cambrian assemblages in the EEP.

The Siberian Platform

Three discrete facies belts are recognized in the Cambrian of the Siberian Platform (Fig. 1.C ). They are: a southwestern carbonaceous-evaporite zone, a northeastern normal marine zone and an intermediate biohermal zone. The first occupies about two-thirds of Siberia and is dominated by shallow water dolomites, anhydrites and salts. The northeastern basin was comparatively deep. Here clayey limestones were the major accumulation. In the intermediate zone dolomites and biohermal limestones predominate. The occurrence of phytoplankton in Siberia is strongly controlled by these facies. Cambrian sediments in the southwestern shallow water evaporite basin do not yield acritarchs. Assemblages from southern Siberia, known in literature as Vendian-?Early Cambrian (Rudavskaya, 1964, 1985) were subsequently dated as undoubtedly Vendian (Faizullin, 1996; Moczydlowska et alii, 1993). The earliest Cambrian acritarch assemblages are recorded from the southwestern marginal trough in the Mana depression of the Krasnoyarsk region (Pyatiletov, 1976). They include Granomarginata, Leiomarginata, Micrhystridium, Baltisphaeridium and are correlated with the oldest Cambrian assemblages of the EEP, i.e. with the collection from the Lontovaskiy Horizon (Fig. 2 ) and possibly with the succeeding younger one. However, the validity of the correlation is problematic. First, the appearance of the two first-mentioned taxa in the EEP is documented as being at the base of the Cambrian. But in Siberia these forms are present in strata definitely of Vendian age. A second difficulty is probably due to confusion regarding systematics along with differing interpretations regarding the taxonomics of East-European and Siberian taxa. The Lena-Olenek area of the intermediate facies belt of Siberia (Fig. 1.C ) is the only locality where two consecutive undoubted Early Cambrian acritarch assemblages have been established (Rudavskaya, unpublished; Vasil'eva & Rudavskaya, 1989; Faizullin, 1996). They are interpreted as representing the "Lontovaskiy" and "Talsinskiy" types of the EEP assemblages (Fig. 2 ).

Only poor acritarch data mainly of leiosphaerids are known from the upper Lower Cambrian sediments of the Igaro-Norilsk region (Mikhailova, 1987), in the northeastern facies zone of Siberia (Fig. 1.C ).

Middle Cambrian species, identified as Baltisphaeridium kenkemense Rudavskaya 1978, Baltisphaeridium spp., occur in rather poor, almost monospecific associations at the upper limit of the Siberian Amgian Stage in the Yakutsk region (Rudavskaya & Kokoulin, 1978) and from the Mayan Stage in the Igaro-Norilsk region (Mikhailova, 1987).

Nothing has yet been published on Upper Cambrian acritarchs from Siberia.

Conclusions

It is evident that one of the main reasons for the conspicuous difference in the quantity of acritarch data from the East-European and Siberian platforms is Cambrian palaeogeography (Li & Powell, 2001). The discrete palaeolongitudinal positions of the two platforms caused sedimentation to differ in the two palaeobasins. The EEP, a part of Baltica, was situated at about 30°S palaeolatitude in the Early Cambrian (530 Ma) and between 30°S and 60°S in the Late Cambrian (505 Ma). There, in a relatively cool climate, thick siliciclastic sequences accumulated. These sediments are favorable to the growth of acritarchs and their preservation. On the other hand, although the original south latitude was about the same for both basins during the Early Cambrian, Siberia drifted towards the equator, where in a warm climate carbonaceous and evaporitic rocks were deposited. Dolomites, anhydrites, and salts, which are widely distributed on the Siberian Platform, do not contain acritarchs. Another reason for the limited records concerning the acritarchs of Siberia is the inadequate study of deep water facies there. Middle and Upper Cambrian strata have not been studied adequately, because for many years the main interest of acritarchologists working in Siberia was the study of the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary interval. To develop our ideas about Cambrian phytoplankton diversity and distribution on the Siberian Platform more palynological investigations are necessary.

Back to top!

Bibliographic references

Faizullin M.Sh. (1996).- Znachenije tret'ego kompleksa mikrofossilij dlja biostratigrafii vend-kembrijskikh otlozhenij sibirskoj platformy.- Geologija i geofizika, Novosibirsk, vol. 37, n° 11, p. 33-40 (in Russian).

Jankauskas T. & Lendzon K. (1992).- Lower and Middle Cambrian acritarch-based biosonation of the Baltic syneclise and adjacent areas (East-European Platform).- Przegląd Geologiczny, Warszawa, vol. 9, p. 519-525.

Li Z.X. & Powell C.McA. (2001).- An outline of the palaeogeographic evolution of the Australasian region since the beginning of the Neopoterozoic.- Earth-Science Reviews, Amsterdam, vol. 53, n° 3-4, p. 237-277.

Mikhailova N.S. (1987).- Akritarkhi srednekembrijskikh otlozhenij r. Sukharikhi (raion Igarki).- Izvestiya Akademii Nauk, Moskva, Serija Geologicheskaya, vol. 10, p. 124-126 (in Russian).

Moczydlowska M., Vidal G. & Rudavskaya V.A. (1993).- Neoproterozoic (Vendian) phytoplankton from the Siberian Platform, Yakutia.- Palaeontology, London, vol. 36, part 3, p. 495-521.

Nikishin A.M., Ziegler P.A., Stephenson R.A., Cloetingh S.A.P.L., Furne A.V., Fokin P.A., Ershov A.V., Bolotov S.N., Korotaev M.V., Alekseev A.S., Gorbachev V.I., Shipilov E.V., Lankreijer A., Bembinova E.Yu. & Shalimov I.V. (1996).- Late Precambrian to Triassic history of the East European Craton: Dynamics of sedimentary basin evolution.- Tectonophysics, Amsterdam, vol. 268, n° 1-4, p. 23-63.

Paškevičiene L.T. (1980).- Akritarkhi pogranichnykh otlozhenij venda i kembrija zapada vostochno-evropejskoj platformy.- Nauka, Moskva, 60 p. (in Russian).

Pyatiletov V.G. (1976).- Mikrofossilii (akritarkhi) iz dokembrijskikh i nizhnekembrijskikh otlozhenij manskogo progiba. In: Zuravleva I.T. (ed.), Stratigrafija i paleontologija nizhnego i srednego kembrija SSSR.- Trudy Akademii Nauk, Novosibirsk, vol. 296, p. 180-186 (in Russian).

Rudavskaya V.A. (1964).- Fitoplankton pozdnego dokembrija i kembrija juzhnoj chasti sibirskoj platformy. Sistematika i metody izuchenija iskopaemoj pyl'tsy i spor.- Nauka, Moskva, p. 223-227 (in Russian).

Rudavskaya V.A. (1985).- Stratigraficheskoje znachenije acritarch proterozoja rannego kembrija dlja sibirskoj i russkoj platform. In: Timoshina N.A. (ed.), Palinologicheskije issledovanija otlozhenij paleozoja i mezozoja severa SSSR i prikaspija.- Trudy VNIGRI (All Russia Petroleum Research Exploration Institute), Leningrad, p. 4-12 (in Russian).

Rudavskaya V.A. & Kokoulin M.L. (1978).- Akritarckhi srednego kembrija Yakutii. In: Vosjennikova T.F. (ed.), Palaeontological research in Siberia.- Trudy Akademii Nauk, Moskva, vol. 374, p. 9-10 (in Russian).

Timofeev B.V. (1959).- Drevnejshaja flora pribalriki i ee stratigraficheskoje znachenije.- Trudy VNIGRI, Leningrad, vol. 129, 320 p.

Vasilieva N.I. (1998).- Melkaya rakovinnaya fauna i biostratigrafija nizhnego kembrija sibirskoj platformy. In: Kirichkova A.I. (ed.).- Trudy VNIGRI (All Russia Petroleum Research Exploration Institute), Saint-Petersburg, 139 p. (in Russian).

Vasilieva N.I. & Rudavskaya V.A. (1989).- Zakonomernosti rasprostranenija fauny i fitoplanktonnykh soobshestv v pogranichnykh otlozhenijakh venda i nizhnego kembrija na sibirskoj platforme. In: Mesezhnikov M.S. & Chirva S.A. (eds.), Metodicheskije aspekty stratigraficheskikh issledovanij v neftegazonosnykh bassejnakh.- Trudy VNIGRI (All Russia Petroleum Research Exploration Institute), Leningrad, p. 69-79 (in Russian).

Volkova N.A. (1973).- Akritarkhi i korreljatsija venda i kembrija zapadnoj chasti russkoj platformy. In: Laverov N.P. (ed.).- Sovetskaja Geologija, Moskva, vol. 4, p. 48-62 (in Russian).

Volkova N.A. (1983).- Akritarkhi srednego i verkhnego kembrija severo-zapada vostochno-evropejskoj platformy.- Stratigrafija i korreljatsija osadkov metodami palinologii, Abstracts of IV Palynological Conference in Tumen', 1981, Sverdlovslk, p. 13-17 (in Russian).

Volkova N.A. (1990).- Akritarkhi srednego i vernego kembrija vostochno-evropejskoj platformy. In: Meyen S.V. (ed.).- Trudy GIN, Nauka, Moskva, 115 p. (in Russian).

Volkova N.A. & Kir'janov V.V. (1995).- Regional'naja stratigraficheskaja skhema sredne-verkhnekembrijskikh otlozhenij vostochno-evropejskoj platformy.- Stratigrafiya, Geologicheskaya Korrelyatsiya, Moskva, vol. 3, n° 5, p. 66-74 (in Russian).

Volkova N.A., Kir'janov V.V., Piskun L.V., Paškevičiene L.T. & Jankauskas T.V. (1979).- Rastitel'nyje mikrofossilii. In: Keller B.M. & Rozanov A.Yu. (eds.), Upper Precambrian and Cambrian palaeontology of East-European Platform.- Nauka, Moskva, p. 4-39 (in Russian).


Back to top!

Figures

Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Figure 1: 1.A. Geographic location of Cambrian acritarch assemblages analyzed in this paper. 1.B-C. Schematic sketch of facies zonation in the East-European and Siberian sedimentary basins during the Cambrian.
Legend: 1- near-shore sands and shales, 2- shallow-marine sands and shales, 3- shales and sands, 4- carbonates, 5- continental slope, 6- relatively deep-water clayey limestones, 7- biohermal limestones and dolomites, 8- shallow-water dolomites, anhydrites and salts, 9- southwestern carbonaceous-evaporite basin, 10- intermediate biohermal basin, 11- northeastern normal marine basin, 12- Early Cambrian acritarch assemblages, 13- Middle Cambrian acritarch assemblages, 14- Late Cambrian acritarch assemblages.

Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Figure 2: Cambrian acritarch-based biostratigraphy of the East-European Platform and stratigraphic location of recorded acritarch data from the Siberian Platform.


Back to Top!