Carnets Geol. 14 (15)  

Click here to close the window!

Contents

[1. Introduction] [2. Study area] [3. Material and methods] [4. Paleontology]
[5. Distribution of ostracodes and paleoecology] [6. Paleogeography]
[7. Conclusions] and ... [Bibliographic references]


Ostracodes from the Upper Cretaceous deposits of the Potiguar Basin, northeastern Brazil: taxonomy, paleoecology and paleobiogeography.
Part 2: Santonian-Campanian

Enelise Katia Piovesan

itt Fossil - Instituto Tecnológico de Micropaleontologia, UNISINOS, Av. Unisinos, 950, São Leopoldo, RS (Brazil)
;

Maria Cristina Cabral

Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências, Departamento de Geologia e Centro de Geologia, Campo Grande, C6, 4º, 1749-016 Lisboa (Portugal)

Jean-Paul Colin

Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências, Centro de Geologia, Campo Grande, C6, 4º, 1749-016 Lisboa (Portugal); deceased (Carbonel et al., 2013)

Gerson Fauth

itt Fossil - Instituto Tecnológico de Micropaleontologia, UNISINOS, Av. Unisinos, 950, São Leopoldo, RS (Brazil)

Cristianini Trescastro Bergue

itt Fossil - Instituto Tecnológico de Micropaleontologia, UNISINOS, Av. Unisinos, 950, São Leopoldo, RS (Brazil)

Published online in final form (pdf) on October 14, 2014
[Editor: Bruno Granier; language editor: Robert W. Scott]

Click here to download the PDF version!

Abstract

Sixty-four Ostracoda taxa were recorded from the Santonian–Campanian of Potiguar Basin, northeastern Brazil. The following new species were described: Triebelina anterotuberculata, Triebelina obliquocostata, Cophinia ovalis, Fossocytheridea potiguarensis, Ovocytheridea anterocompressa, Ovocytheridea triangularis, Perissocytheridea jandairensis, Semicytherura musacchioi and Protocosta babinoti. The faunal association indicates predominantly shallow marine environments, intercalated with typically mixohaline levels. These species are mostly endemic, although the presence of six species common to West and North Africa shows that migration was still possible by the end of the Cretaceous.

Key-words

Ostracodes; Santonian–Campanian; Potiguar Basin; paleoecology; paleogeography.

Citation

Piovesan E.K., Cabral M.C., Colin J.-P., Fauth G. & Trescastro Bergue C. (2014).- Ostracodes from the Upper Cretaceous deposits of the Potiguar Basin, northeastern Brazil: taxonomy, paleoecology and paleobiogeography. Part 2: Santonian-Campanian.- Carnets de Géologie [Notebooks on Geology], Brest, vol. 14, nº 15, p. 315-341.

Résumé

Les ostracodes des sédiments du Crétacé supérieur du Bassin de Potiguar, NE Brésil : taxonomie, paléoécologie et paléobiogéographie. Deuxième partie : Santonian-Campanien.- 64 taxons d'ostracodes ont été recensés dans les sédiments de l'intervalle Santonien–Campanien du Bassin de Potiguar Basin, NE Brésil. De nouvelles espèces sont décrites ; il s'agit de Triebelina anterotuberculata, Triebelina obliquocostata, Cophinia ovalis, Fossocytheridea potiguarensis, Ovocytheridea anterocompressa, Ovocytheridea triangularis, Perissocytheridea jandairensis, Semicytherura musacchioi et Protocosta babinoti. L'association faunistique nous indique prédominamment des environnements marins peu profonds, présentant des intercalations de niveaux à faune typiquement mixohaline. Ces ostracodes sont pour la plupart des espèces endémiques, toutefois la présence de six espèces communes à l'Afrique de l'Ouest et du Nord montre que le phénomène migratoire était toujours possible vers la fin du Crétacé.

Mots-clefs

Ostracodes ; Santonien-Campanien ; Bassin de Potiguar ; paléoécologie ; paléobiogéographie.


1. Introduction

This work follows up the study of the Upper Cretaceous ostracodes from Potiguar Basin, including the taxonomy, paleoecological and paleobiogeographical approaches. The first part (Piovesan et al., 2014) deals with the Turonian assemblages, whereas this work presents the study of the Santonian–Campanian assemblages.

Few studies on Upper Cretaceous ostracodes from the Northeast Brazilian margin have been published hitherto. For the Potiguar Basin two papers were published dealing exclusively with marine Upper Cretaceous ostracodes (Delicio et al., 2000; Viviers et al., 2000). In contrast, the Sergipe Basin, contiguous to the study area, has been studied in more detail since the 60's (Krömmelbein, 1964, 1966a, 1966b, 1967; Neufville, 1973a, 1979; Viviers et al., 2000). A more complete review of previous studies on marine ostracodes from the Upper Cretaceous of northeastern Brazil can be found in Piovesan et al. (2014).

Studies from African basins, such as Gambia (Apostolescu, 1963), Algeria (Vivière, 1987), Morocco (Andreu, 1996), Nigeria (Reyment, 1960; Neufville, 1973a, 1973b; Okosun, 1987, 1992; Gebhardt, 1999a, 1999b), Egypt (El-Nady, 2008), Gabon (Neufville, 1973a), and Cameroon (Grékoff, 1951, 1962) revealed their importance as a source of data for taxonomy of the Potiguar Basin assemblages.

2. Study area

The Potiguar Basin is located at the intersection of the equatorial margin with the east continental margin, covering an area of approximately 48,000 km² between the Rio Grande do Norte and Ceará States (Fig. 1 ). Geologically, it is limited to the south, east and west by the crystalline basement, and extends north to the 2,000 m isobath (Mohriak, 2003; Pessoa Neto et al., 2007).

The Potiguar Basin originated from extensional stresses during the Early Cretaceous associated with rifting processes that culminated in the separation of the South American from the African plate. Pessoa Neto et al. (2007) divided the deposits in three supersequences: (i) rift, deposited in the Early Cretaceous (Berriasian–Lower Aptian), represented by fluvial-deltaic and lacustrine deposits of the Pendência and Pescada formations; (ii) post-rift, deposited during the Upper Aptian–Lower Albian and characterized by fluvial-deltaic deposits, with the first records of marine ingression (Alagamar Formation), and (iii) drift, comprising the entire marine sedimentation, from the Lower Albian to the Recent.

The Jandaíra Formation results from the first major marine ingression originally from the north (Brito, 1976). This unit consists predominantly of bioclastic calcarenites and calcilutites deposited in tidal flat environments on a shallow platform (Monteiro & Faria, 1988; Araripe & Feijó, 1994). Araripe & Feijó (1994), reviewing internal reports of Petrobras (the Brazilian oil company) attributed a Turonian–Campanian age to this formation, which was later corroborated by Pessoa Neto et al. (2007).

The Santonian was dated by the last occurrence of the planktonic foraminifers Dicarinella concavata and Whiteinella inornata. The base of Campanian is marked by the last occurrence of D. concavata and the top by the last occurrence of the palynomorph Auriculiidites reticulatus (Viviers et al., 2000). The ostracode zone OP-5 (Santonian–Campanian) is marked by the presence of Ovocytheridea triangularis sp. nov. (= Ovocytheridea aff. O. producta Viviers et al., 2000) and Soudanella semicostellata (= Protobuntonia aff. P. semicostellata Viviers et al., 2000). The ostracode sub-zone OP-5.1 (Santonian) was identified by the range of Leguminocythereis reymenti (= Leguminocythereis aff. L. reymenti Viviers et al., 2000). The ostracode sub-zone OP-5.2 (Santonian–Campanian) is marked by the last occurrence of Leguminocythereis reymenti and the presence of Fossocytheridea potiguarensis sp. nov. (= Sarlatina sp. 1 Viviers et al., 2000).

Fig. 1
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Figure 1: Potiguar Basin, showing the position of the studied well, 9-MO-13-RN, located in Mossoró city, Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil (from Geological Survey of Brazil).

3. Material and methods

One hundred and seven samples were analyzed, covering 180 meters from the well 9-MO-13-RN (Fig. 2 ). The samples averaged 60 g and are mainly represented by limestone intercalated with some levels of silt. The samples were processed using the standard technique for fossil ostracodes, which consists of disintegration with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), washing through sieves with meshes of 250, 180 and 63 micrometers and dried at 60º C overnight. The selected specimens were imaged using a Zeiss EVO MA15 scanning electron microscope. Only Part of the material was only illustrated (Appendix 1) and includes the taxa undetermined due to the scarcity, preservation, reduced stratigraphic value or even to the impossibility of inclusion in any taxon described up to now.

The map of the studied area was created using ArcGIS® software version 9.3 by ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). The complete micropaleontological data were plotted using the StrataBugs® software, with well depth on the Y-axis and the identified taxa on the X-axis. The statistical data were calculated using the PAST software (Hammer et al., 2001; Hammer & Harper, 2006) and Microsoft Excel®.

Fig. 2
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Figure 2: Lithological profile and electrical logs of the studied interval of the well 9-MO-13-RN.

4. Paleontology

Taxonomy follows the classification of Horne (2005). In the systematic descriptions, the following abbreviations/conventions are employed: L: length, H: height, W: width; very small (<0.400 mm), small (0.400-0.500 mm), medium (0.510-0.700 mm), large (0.710-0.900 mm), very large (>0.900 mm); C: carapace, RV: right valve, LV: left valve, DV: dorsal view, VV: ventral view, EV: external view (valve), IV: internal view; f: female, m: male. All dimensions are in mm. Type and figured specimens are deposited in the collections of Museu de História Geológica do Rio Grande do Sul, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, under the prefix ULVG followed by their respective catalogue numbers. All dimensions of the figured specimens are in the plate captions.

Class Ostracoda Latreille, 1802

Subclass Podocopa Sars, 1866

Order Platycopida Sars, 1866

Suborder Platycopina Sars, 1866

Superfamily Cytherelloidea Sars, 1866

Family Cytherellidae Sars, 1866

Genus Cytherella Jones, 1849

Cytherella gambiensis Apostolescu, 1963

(Pl. 1 , figs. A-D)

1963 Cytherella gambiensis Apostolescu, p. 1680, Pl. 1, figs. 1-3.

non 1981 Cytherella cf. gambiensis Apostolescu - Bismuth et al., p. 221-222, Pl. 6, figs. 1-2.

1985 Cytherella cf. gambiensis Apostolescu - Vivière, p. 137-138, Pl. 1, fig. 7.

2000 Cytherella gambiensis Apostolescu - Delicio et al., p. 331-332, Figs. 8.3-8.4.

2000 Cytherella aff. C. gambiensis Viviers et al., p. 415, Figs. 8, 5-6 and 9-11.

Material: 286 specimens.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Stratigraphic and geographic distribution: Turonian of Algeria (Vivière, 1985), Senonian of Gambia (Apostolescu, 1963), Upper Cretaceous of Potiguar Basin (Delicio et al., 2000), Coniacian–Campanian (Viviers et al., 2000) and Santonian–Campanian (this work) of Potiguar Basin.

Remarks: Despite the similarity, Cytherella paenovata Alexander, 1932, from the Upper Cretaceous of Texas, USA, has the maximum height at mid-length and has a small posterior projection. The species identified by Bold (1964) as Cytherella aff. paenovata in the Cenomanian–Santonian of Egypt is significantly larger and has a less pronounced overlap. Bismuth et al. (1981) identified Cytherella cf. gambiensis in the Turonian of Tunisia, but the Bismuth's species has a much more prominent overlap of the valves.

Cytherella mediatlasica Andreu, 1996

(Pl. 1 , figs. E-I)

1987 Cytherella sp. Okosun, p. 25, Pl. 13, figs. 5-6.

1992 Cytherella sp. Okosun, p. 328, Pl. 2, fig. 20.

1996 Cytherella mediatlasica Andreu, p. 484-485, 488, Pl. 1, figs. 1-10.

2000 Cytherella sp. P6 Viviers, Koutsoukos, Silva-Telles & Bengtson, p. 415, fig. 8, 14-15.

Material: 182 specimens.

Brief description: Carapace large, sub-rectangular in lateral view, sub-rectangular to sub-oval in dorsal view. RV larger than the left one, with overlap along all margins, except in the posterior margin of the females. Dorsal margin of the RV almost straight, LV with a concavity in front of the mid-length; ventral margin slightly sinuous and subparallel to the dorsal margin. Maximum height in the posterior third. Anterior margin symmetrically rounded, posterior margin rounded to slightly truncated. Morphotype A: Surface punctated, with fine ribs parallel to the anterior margin. Morphotype B: Surface entirely and regularly punctated. Sexual dimorphism very pronounced, with females larger than males and presenting "brood-pouches".

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Stratigraphic and geographic distribution: Turonian–Santonian of Nigeria (Okosun, 1987, 1992), Santonian of Morocco (Andreu, 1996), Turonian–Campanian of Potiguar Basin, Brazil (Viviers et al., 2000; this work).

Remarks: The presence of different morphotypes in this species was observed by Andreu (1996) in the Santonian of Morocco. In the Turonian of this well (Piovesan et al., 2014) only specimens of the morphotype A were recorded.

 Cytherella aff. austinensis Alexander, 1929

(Pl. 1 , figs. J-L)

aff. 1929 Cytherella austinensis Alexander, p. 51-52, Pl. 2, figs. 4, 6.

1973a Cytherella aff. austinensis Alexander - Neufville, p. 123-124, Pl. 2, fig. 1a-c.

1991 Cytherella sp. 1 Andreu, p. 441-442, Pl. 4, figs. 5-7.

2000 Cytherella austinensis Alexander - Delicio et al., p. 331, Figs. 8.1-8.2.

2008 Cytherella austinensis Alexander - El-Nady et al., p. 539, Pl. 1, fig. 3.

Material: 765 specimens.

Brief description: carapace of medium size, oblong-oval in lateral view, lanceolate in dorsal view. RV larger than the left one, with overlap along all margins. Maximum height behind mid-length; maximum width in the posterior third. Dorsal margin almost straight to slightly convex; ventral margin convex in the females, straight in the males. Anterior margin broad and uniformly rounded; posterior margin lower and obliquely rounded. Surface smooth. Sexual dimorphism present, with males lower, narrower and more elongate than females.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Stratigraphic and geographic distribution: Upper Cretaceous (Delicio et al., 2000) and Santonian–Campanian (this work) of the Potiguar Basin, Brazil, Cenomanian of Morocco (Andreu, 1991) and of Gabon (Neufville, 1973a), Turonian–Santonian of Egypt (El-Nady et al., 2008).

Remarks: This species is similar to Cytherella austinensis Alexander, 1929, from the Cretaceous of Texas, USA, but has the maximum height in the posterior third, a different outline at the posterior margin and a small compression in dorsomedian region. The outline of this species is similar to Cytherella sp. 2 recorded by Piovesan et al. (2009) in the Maastrichtian of the Pará-Maranhão Basin, Brazil. However, Cytherella sp. 2 Piovesan et al., 2009, is slightly compressed along all margins and has an anteromarginal rim. Cytherella sergipensis Neufville, 1973, is significantly wider and the male specimens are more elongated than the species recorded herein.

Cytherella POT 1

(Pl. 1 , figs. M-P)

Material: 143 specimens.

Brief description: Carapace large, sub-oval in lateral view, very broad in dorsal view. Maximum height and maximum width slightly behind the mid-length. RV overlaps the left one along the entire periphery. Dorsal margin convex, ventral margin almost straight, with a slight concavity in the middle of the LV. Anterior and posterior margins rounded. Surface smooth.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: The carapace of this species is significantly less robust and the overlap is less pronounced than in Cytherella gambiensis (see above). This species is similar to Cytherella gr. ovata (Roemer, 1841) which has been recorded in the Cretaceous of many countries in America, Asia, Africa and Europe. Some of these records are similar to the species recorded in this study (e.g., Rosenfeld & Raab, 1974; Honigstein et al., 1985; Vivière, 1985; Majoran, 1989; Andreu, 1991). However, the Brazilian species differs from C. ovata figured by the cited authors especially in the posterior region, which is more rounded.

Genus Cytherelloidea Alexander, 1929

 Cytherelloidea POT 1

(Pl. 1 , figs. Q-R)

Material: 4 specimens.

Brief description: Carapace of medium size, sub-rectangular in lateral and dorsal views. RV larger than the left one. Greatest height at anterior third, maximum width in the posterior region. Dorsal margin nearly straight, with the left valve with a concavity in the anterior third; ventral margin straight. Anterior margin rounded, posterior margin obliquely rounded, slightly projecting upward. Carapace surface with strong ribs: a marginal rib, along all margins and two central ribs, C-shaped, one in the median-dorsal region and another in the ventral region.

Age: Santonian.

Remarks: This species is similar to Cytherelloidea sp. P1 Viviers et al., 2000, recorded in the Coniacian–Lower Campanian of Potiguar Basin, but has a more rounded outline and the posterior margin projected downwards.

Order Podocopida Sars, 1866

Suborder Bairdiocopina Sars, 1887

Superfamily Bairdioidea Sars, 1887

Family Bairdiidae Sars, 1887

Genus Bairdoppilata Coryell, Sample & Jennings, 1935

Bairdoppilata POT 1

(Pl. 2 , figs. A-C)

Material: 50 specimens.

Brief description: carapace large, very robust, sub-trapezoidal in lateral view, inflated in dorsal view. Overlap on the RV very pronounced, more developed in the dorsal and ventral margins. Maximum height at mid-length, maximum width slightly in front of the mid-length. Dorsal margin almost straight in the RV and convex in the LV; ventral margin convex. Anterior and posterior margins asymmetrically rounded. Surface punctated in the anterior and posterior parts.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Genus Neonesidea Maddocks, 1969

Neonesidea POT 1

(Pl. 2 , figs. D-G)

Material: 61 specimens.

Brief description: carapace large, ovate to sub-rhomboidal in lateral view, inflated in dorsal view. LV overlaps the right one along the dorsal and ventral margins. Maximum height at anterior cardinal angle, maximum width slightly in front of the mid-length. Dorsal margin of the RV straight, slightly convex in the LV; ventral margin of the LV straight, sinuous in the RV. Anterior and posterior margins asymmetrically rounded. The carapace has a compression in the anterior, anteroventral and posteroventral regions. Surface smooth.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: Although the differentiation between the Bairdiidae genera is mainly based on appendages and internal carapace morphology, this species is assigned to Neonesidea due to the absence of any posterodorsal concavity or pronounced ventral sinuation, which are diagnostic external characteristics of Bairdoppilata.

 Genus Triebelina Bold, 1946

Triebelina anterotuberculata Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov.

(Pl. 2 , figs. H-L)

Derivatio nominis: After the presence of a marked tubercle in the anterior region.

Material: 65 specimens.

Holotype: C, ULVG-9860 (Pl. 2, fig. H), sample 111.80 m.

Paratypes: ULVG-9859, ULVG-9860.

Dimensions: Holotype: L: 0.940, H: 0.505, W: 0.409.

Paratypes: L: 0.744-0.860, H: 0.416-0.478, W: 0.310-0.360.

Type-locality: 9-MO-13-RN, coordinates UTM: 682595E / 9428410N (zone 24S), 111.80 m, Potiguar Basin, Brazil.

Diagnosis: A species of the genus Triebelina characterized by a very large, sub-trapezoidal and moderately calcified carapace. Surface punctated, with an anterior tubercle in both valves and a developed concavity in the ventral margin of the RV.

Description: carapace very large, sub-trapezoidal in lateral view, sub-rectangular and narrow in dorsal view. Overlap of the LV on the RV slightly and uniformly developed, except in the anterior and posterior regions, where it is not present. Greatest height at anterior cardinal angle. Maximum width at mid-length. Dorsal margin almost straight, ventral margin with a concavity in the mid-length of the RV, almost straight in the LV. Surface densely punctated. Presence of a sharp tubercle in the anterior region, above the mid-height, in both valves. Anterior and posterior regions with a slight compression. Internal features not observed.

Sexual dimorphism: not observed.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: Triebelina keiji Colin & Lauverjat, 1978, from Cenomanian–Turonian of Portugal is very similar to the Brazilian species, but has two anterior tubercles and the posterior region is more projected and compressed.

Triebelina obliquocostata Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov.

(Pl. 2 , figs. M-P)

Derivatio nominis: After the developed oblique rib which ornates the lateral surface of this species.

Material: 6 specimens.

Holotype: C, ULVG-9869 (Pl. 2, figs. M-O), sample 74.40 m.

Paratype: ULVG-9870.

Dimensions: Holotype: L: 0.651, H: 0.378, W: 0.411.

Paratype: L: 0.704, H: 0.400, W: 0.432.

Type-locality: 9-MO-13-RN, coordinates UTM: 682595E / 9428410N (zone 24S), 74.40 m, Potiguar Basin, Brazil.

Diagnosis: A species of the genus Triebelina characterized by a large and robust carapace, sub-rhomboidal in lateral view, ventrally flattened. Surface reticulated and with a strong oblique rib, running from the anterior to the posterior region.

Description: carapace large, very robust, sub-rhomboidal in lateral view, inflated in dorsal view, with almost parallel margins. Overlap of the LV on the right one along all margins, except in the anterior one. Maximum height at anterior cardinal angle, maximum width at mid-length. Dorsal margin straight; ventral margin of the LV straight, with a concavity in front of the mid-length in the RV. Anterior and posterior margins asymmetrically rounded. Ventral region strongly flattened. The carapace has a compression in the anterior and posteroventral regions. Surface reticulated and with a strong rib which extends from the anterior region descending to the posterior one. Internal features not observed.

Sexual dimorphism: not observed.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: Despite of the few specimens recovered, this species has marked features that differentiate it from the known species of the genus Triebelina. A similar ornamentation pattern was observed in Triebelina boldi Keij, 1955, recorded in the Miocene of SW France, but the species differs strongly in the outline.

Suborder Cypridocopina Baird, 1850

Superfamily Cypridoidea Baird, 1845

Family Candonidae Kaufmann, 1900

Subfamily Paracypridinae Sars, 1923

Genus Paracypris Sars, 1866

Paracypris aff. posteriusacuminatus Andreu, 1996

(Pl. 3 , figs. A-C)

aff. 1996 Paracypris posteriusacuminatus Andreu, p. 489, Pl. 2,figs. 6-12.

2000 Paracypris sp. 1 Delicio, Coimbra & Carreño, p. 334, Figs. 8.8-8.10.

Material: 114 specimens.

Brief description: Carapace large, elongated and sub-triangular in lateral view, sub-oval elongated in dorsal view. Greatest height slightly behind the mid-length, greatest width at mid-length. Overlap of the RV along all margins being less pronounced in the ventral one. Dorsal margin convex, ventral margin almost straight. Anterior margin obliquely rounded, posterior margin acuminate. Posterodorsal region angulated. Surface smooth.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Stratigraphic and geographic distribution: Upper Cretaceous of Potiguar Basin (Delicio et al., 2000) and Santonian–Campanian (this work).

Remarks: Despite the similarity, P. posteriusacuminatus Andreu, 1996, from the Santonian of Morocco, has the posterior cardinal angle less marked and is shorter, wider and more elongated.

Suborder Cytherocopina Baird, 1850

Superfamily Cytheroidea Baird, 1850

Family Cytherideidae Sars, 1925

Genus Cophinia Apostolescu, 1961

Cophinia ovalis Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov.

(Pl. 3 , figs. D-I)

2000 Cophinia aff. C. apiformis Viviers, Koutsoukos, Silva-Telles & Bengtson, p. 423, Fig. 13, 1-4.

Derivatio nominis: After its ovoid lateral and dorsal outlines.

Material: 449 specimens.

Holotype: C, f, ULVG- 10389 (Pl. 1, fig. D), sample 30.40 m.

Paratypes: ULVG-10384, ULVG-10390, ULVG-10226, ULVG-10302.

Dimensions: holotype: L: 0.960, H: 0.700, W: 0.560.

Paratypes: L: 0.840-0.920, H: 0.580-0.649, W: 0.440-0.500.

Type-locality: 9-MO-13-RN, coordinates UTM: 682595E / 9428410N (zone 24S), 30.40 m, Potiguar Basin, Brazil.

Diagnosis: A species of Cophinia characterized by an ovoid and heavily calcified carapace, with a pronounced posterior projection near the mid-height.

Description: carapace very large, thick, ovoid in lateral and dorsal views. Left valve larger than the right one, along all margins though less pronounced in the anterior margin. Maximum height and maximum width at mid-length. Dorsal margin strongly convex, ventral margin convex with a small concavity in the anterior half of the right valve. Anterior margin obliquely rounded, posterior margin with a distinct projection of both valves, located around mid-height giving the carapace its typical appearance. Surface smooth. Merodont hinge.

Sexual dimorphism: pronounced, with females higher, more inflated and less elongated than males.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: This species differs from Cophinia apiformis (Reyment, 1960), from the Coniacian–Lower Santonian of Nigeria, mainly in the much more oval outline and in the ventral margin, which is more convex. Moreover, in C. apiformis, the posterior projection is more developed in the LV and less developed in the RV. Cophinia ovata Apostolescu, 1963 (Senonian, Senegal), has a deep anterodorsal sulcus observed in lateral and dorsal views and the posterior projection less pronounced. In dorsal view, this species is similar to Ovocytheridea acuta Apostolescu, 1963, from the Senonian of Gambia, but, in lateral view, O. acuta displays a downward projection in the RV, differing from the Brazilian species. O. acuta is probably a species of Cophinia.

Stratigraphic and geographic distribution: Santonian–Campanian, Potiguar Basin, Brazil (Viviers et al., 2000; this work).

Genus Fossocytheridea Swain & Brown, 1964

 Fossocytheridea potiguarensis Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov.

(Pl. 3 , figs. J-P)

2000 Sarlatina sp. P5 Viviers, Koutsoukos, Silva-Telles & Bengtson, p. 424, Fig. 14, 5-8.

Derivatio nominis: After the Potiguar Basin, where this species was found.

Material: 600 specimens.

Holotype: C, f, ULVG-10181 (Pl. 1, fig. J), sample 33.80 m.

Paratypes: ULVG-10195, ULVG-10184, ULVG-10187, ULVG-10169, ULVG-10186, ULVG-10177.

Dimensions: holotype: L: 1.060, H: 0.640, W: 0.540.

Paratypes: L: 0.920-1.220, H: 0.540-0.660, W: 0.460-0.520.

Type-locality: 9-MO-13-RN, coordinates UTM: 682595E / 9428410N (zone 24S), 33.80 m, Potiguar Basin, Brazil.

Diagnosis: A species of Fossocytheridea characterized by a very large carapace, with an oblique and shallow anterodorsal sulcal depression and a slightly compressed anterior margin.

Description: carapace very large, heavily calcified, sub-rectangular in lateral view, sub-ovate in dorsal view. Anterior and posterior cardinal angles weakly developed. The left valve overlaps the right one along all margins, less pronounced dorsomedially and posteroventrally. Greatest height near the mid-length. Anterior and posterior margins obliquely rounded. Dorsal margin almost straight, truncated along its posterior slope. Ventral margin nearly straight, anteriorly sinuous. The density of the normal pores is low. The pores are large and distributed over the whole surface of the valves. The anterodorsal sulcal depression is shallow and obliquely inclined towards the anteroventral margin. Anterior region slightly compressed. Antimerodont hinge, LV with an elongated crenulated anterior socket, crenulated bar and a smaller posterior crenulated socket.

Sexual dimorphism: pronounced, females higher in the posterior third, shorter, more inflated and with a more convex ventral margin than males; in dorsal view the greatest width is located more posteriorly.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Stratigraphic and geographic distribution: Santonian–Campanian of Potiguar Basin, Brazil (Viviers et al., 2000; this work).

Remarks: Fossocytheridea lenoirensis Swain & Brown, 1964 (Albian–Lower Cenomanian, North Carolina, USA), differs from this species in possessing a more acute posterior margin, especially in the RV and a deeper anterodorsal sulcal depression. Fossocytheridea kirklandi Tibert, Colin, Leckie & Babinot, 2003 (Cenomanian, Utah, USA) can be distinguished by its shorter length, more flattened anterior margin and presence of ocular swelling. Fossocytheridea maliensis (Colin, Tambareau & Krasheninnikov, 1996), recorded in the Campanian –Late Maastrichtian of Mali, has a reniform shape, with the dorsal margin more convex and a more pyriform outline in dorsal view.

Fossocytheridea POT 1

(Pl. 4 , figs. A-D)

Material: 84 specimens.

Brief description: carapace of medium size, sub-rectangular to sub-triangularin lateral view, sub-oval in dorsal view. Overlap of the LV on the RV along all margins, less pronounced in the anterior margin. Maximum height at anterior cardinal angle. Greatest width at anterior third. Anterior and posterior margins asymmetrically rounded. Dorsal and ventral margins almost straight. Anterior cardinal angle well developed. Surface strongly reticulated, with smaller reticula near the anterior and posterior regions. Deep and long median sulcal depression. In dorsal view, the valves are almost parallel, with a marked median sulcal depression. Internal view not observed. Sexual dimorphism observed, with females more sub-triangular, wider and shorter than males.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: Although reticulate species of Fossocytheridea are not common, variable patterns of reticulation are possible, as proposed by Tibert et al. (2003) in the emended diagnosis of the genus.

Fossocytheridea? POT 2

(Pl. 4 , figs. E-H)

Material: 92 specimens.

Brief description: carapace large, heavily calcified, sub-rectangular in lateral view, ovoid in dorsal view. Maximum height at anterior cardinal angle, maximum width before the mid-length. Overlap of the RV along all margins, more pronounced in the dorsal margin. Anterior and posterior margin obliquely rounded. Dorsal margin almost straight, with well marked cardinal angles; ventral margin slightly convex in the LV and nearly straight in the RV. Anterodorsal sulcal depression very shallow. Surface smooth.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: The precise identification at genus level of this specie is still under study due to the poor development of the anterodorsal sulcal depression.

Genus Ovocytheridea Grékoff, 1951

Ovocytheridea anterocompressa Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov.

(Pl. 4 , figs. I-M)

Derivatio nominis: After the compression in the anterior zone.

Material: 1943 specimens.

Holotype: C, f, ULVG-10283 (Pl. 4, figs. I-K), sample 47.60 m.

Paratypes: ULVG-10237, ULVG-10160.

Dimensions: holotype: L: 0.840, H: 0.520, W: 0.400.

Paratypes: L: 0.700-0.780, H: 0.420-0.460, W: 0.320.

Type-locality: 9-MO-13-RN, coordinates UTM: 682595E / 9428410N (zone 24S), 47.60 m, Potiguar Basin, Brazil.

Diagnosis: A species of Ovocytheridea with a sub-rectangular to sub-triangular carapace, with a shallow median sulcus and an anterior region compressed.

Description: carapace large, sub-rectangular to sub-triangular in lateral view, sub-oval elongated in dorsal view. LV overlaps RV along entire margin, less pronounced in the anterior region. Greatest height before mid-length, greatest width just in front of the mid-length. Anterior margin asymmetrically rounded, posterior margin strongly truncated and slightly projected downwards in the RV. Dorsal margin convex, ventral margin almost straight in the LV valve, slightly concave in the RV. Anterior region compressed. Surface smooth. Presence of a sulcus in the middle of the carapace and of another sulcus, very subtle, in the anterodorsal region. Hinge of the LV with an anterior large and crenulated socket and a crenulated bar; posterior element not preserved.

Sexual dimorphism: observed, females higher and shorter than males.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: this species is less triangular and lower than Ovocytheridea sp. aff. producta Grékoff, 1962, recorded in this study. It differs from O. triangularis sp. nov. (this work) by the less developed anterodorsal sulcus.

Ovocytheridea triangularis Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov.

(Pl. 4 , figs. N-R)

2000 Ovocytheridea aff. O. producta Grékoff, 1962 - Viviers et al., p. 423, Fig. 13, 21-22.

Derivatio nominis: From the general aspect of the carapace.

Material: 261 specimens.

Holotype: C, f, ULVG-10112 (Pl. 1, fig. N), sample 27.90 m.

Paratypes: ULVG-10119, ULVG-10090, ULVG-10075, ULVG-10149.

Dimensions: holotype: L: 0.880, H: 0.600, W: 0.440.

Paratypes: L: 0.800-0.900, H: 0.480-0.600, W: 0.380-0.460.

Type-locality: 9-MO-13-RN, coordinates UTM: 682595E / 9428410N (zone 24S), 27.90 m, Potiguar Basin, Brazil.

Diagnosis: Sub-triangular and heavily calcified species of Ovocytheridea with a deep anterodorsal sulcus.

Description: carapace large, sub-rectangular to sub-triangular in lateral view, ovoid in dorsal view. LV overlaps the RV along entire margin, more pronounced in the dorsal and ventral margins. Greatest height and width at mid-length on females; in the males the greatest height is at anterior cardinal angle. Anterior margin asymmetrically rounded, posterior margin slightly truncated. Dorsal and ventral margins of the LV convex. In the RV, dorsal margin almost straight, with both cardinal angles well marked; ventral margin sinuous. Anterior region slightly compressed. Surface covered by punctations which are larger in the central part of the carapace and decrease in size towards the periphery. In the anterodorsal region there is a deep and oblique sulcus. In the posteroventral margin of the RV a small protuberance is present, especially in the males. Hinge of the LV with a short anterior crenulated socket, a crenulated bar and a posterior crenulated socket. The anterior and posterior sockets are almost of the same size.

Sexual dimorphism: observed, females higher and wider than males.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Stratigraphic and geographic distribution: Santonian–Campanian, Potiguar Basin, Brazil (Viviers et al., 2000; this work).

Remarks: This species is similar to Ovocytheria brevis Grékoff, 1962, first recorded in the Lower Senonian of Algeria, but the Brazilian species is more elongated, has the anterodorsal sulcus more pronounced and less developed dorsal overlap of the RV. Ovocytheridea brevis (Pl. VII, figs. 6-8) recorded by Bellion et al. (1973) in the Coniacian of Algeria has an anterodorsal sulcus similar to this species; however it is higher and has the ventral margin straighter than the Brazilian one. Ovocytheridea cf. brevis, from the Coniacian of Algeria, figured by Vivière (1985) shows the anterodorsal sulcus very pronounced as seen in the Brazilian species and also a more pronounced dorsal overlap of the RV. Besides the similarity in external lateral view shape (presence of post-ocular sulcus and punctated surface) with the genus Schuleridea Swartz & Swain, 1946, the hinge is different and consistent with the proposal into the genus Ovocytheridea.

Ovocytheridea cf. producta Grékoff, 1962

(Pl. 5 , figs. A-D)

cf. 1962 Ovocytheridea producta Grékoff, p. 118-120, Pl. 1, figs. 9-17; Pl. 2, figs. 24-27.

non 2000 Ovocytheridea aff. O. producta Grékoff - Viviers et al., p. 423, Fig. 13, 21-22.

Material: 49 specimens.

Brief description: carapace large, sub-rectangular to sub-triangular in lateral view, ovoid and inflated in dorsal view. Inequivalve, with the left valve overlapping the right one along the entire periphery, more conspicuous in dorsal and posterior margins. Anterior margin asymmetrically rounded, posterior margin truncated. Dorsal margin convex, ventral margin straight to slightly sinuous. Posteroventral region with a small compressed projection in the RV. Maximum height at mid-length; greatest width near the mid-length of the carapace. Surface scarcely punctate. Internal view: absence of vestibule, anterior marginal pore canals irregular and numerous (more than 20); muscle scars: 4 elongated and rounded, arranged in a vertical row, frontal scar V-shaped and a possible rounded mandibular scar. 

Sexual dimorphism: females shorter and higher than males.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: This species is very similar to O. producta Grékoff, 1962, from the Coniacian of Cameroon, but in this species, in dorsal view, both anterior and posterior extremities are more symmetrical. It differs from Ovocytheridea nuda Grékoff, 1951, from the Campanian of Cameroon, in the less sub-triangular outline and in the posteroventral margin which has a small projection in the RV.

Genus Perissocytheridea Stephenson, 1938

Perissocytheridea jandairensis Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov.

(Pl. 5 , figs. E-I)

2000 Semicytherura sp. P1 Viviers, Koutsoukos, Silva-Telles & Bengtson, p. 424, Fig. 14, 19-23.

Derivatio nominis: After the Jandaíra Formation, where this species was found.

Material: 478 specimens.

Holotype: C, f, ULVG-10193 (Pl. 5, fig. E), sample 34.00 m.

Paratypes: ULVG-10259, ULVG-10179, ULVG-10260, ULVG-10078.

Dimensions: holotype: L: 0.540, H: 0.280, W: 0.380.

Paratypes: L: 0.420-0.610, H: 0.220-0.280, W: 0.220-0.340.

Type-locality: 9-MO-13-RN, coordinates UTM: 682595E / 9428410N (zone 24S), 34.00 m, Potiguar Basin, Brazil.

Diagnosis: A species of Perissocytheridea characterized by a sub-rectangular to sub-trapezoid carapace, surface with longitudinal striations and heavily reticulated, presence of a very deep anterodorsal sulcus and an acuminate posterior margin.

Description: carapace of medium size, sub-rectangular to sub-trapezoid in lateral view, sub-oval, with a marked median sulcus in dorsal view. The valves are almost of the same size, with small overlap of the RV by the LV. Greatest height at anterior cardinal angle, greatest width behind the mid-length. Posterior region compressed. Dorsal margin nearly straight, ventral margin straight to slightly convex. Anterior margin broadly rounded, posterior margin acuminate, with the extremity situated in the lower third of the height. Ventrolateral expansion in the ventral region more pronounced in the males. Carapace strongly reticulated, with ribs parallel to the outline near the margins and, except in the ocular region, longitudinal ribs in the centre. Anterodorsal sulcus well developed. Eye tubercle present. Antimerodont hinge with all elements strongly crenulated.

Sexual dimorphism: the females are shorter and wider than males. The posterior projection is located slightly below the mid-height in the females and in the lower third in the males.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Stratigraphic and geographic distribution: Santonian–Campanian, Potiguar Basin, Brazil (Viviers et al., 2000; this work).

Remarks: Viviers et al. (2000) proposed that this species is a representative of the genus Semicytherura Wagner, 1957. Semicytherura has a caudal process situated subcentrally to subdorsally and the valves often have wing-like lateral prolongations. In our species the caudal process is not present. Perissocytheridea jandairensis sp. nov. differs from Metacytheropteron GA C 24 Grosdidier, 1979, recorded in the Cenomanian–Turonian of Gabon (probably a Perissocytheridea species) mainly in the more pronounced posterior extremity and the less convex dorsal margin.

Family Cytheruridae G.W. Müller, 1894

Genus Eocytheropteron Alexander, 1933

Eocytheropteron POT 1

(Pl. 5 , figs. J-L)

Material: 65 specimens.

Brief description: carapace of medium size, sub-oval in lateral and dorsal views. LV larger than the right one, with overlap more pronounced in the dorsal margin. Greatest height in the anteromedian region, greatest width at mid-length. Dorsal margin almost straight to slightly convex; ventral margin convex, partially hidden by the ventrolateral expansion, especially in the females. Anterior margin obliquely rounded, posterior margin triangular and projected upwards, with a narrow and short caudal process. Surface entirely covered by weak and small reticulation. Sexual dimorphism pronounced, with males longer and lower than females.

Age: Santonian.

Eocytheropteron POT 2

(Pl. 5 , figs. M-N)

1999a Cytheropteron sp. Gebhardt, p. 92, Figs. 6.14-6.15.

2000 Eocytheropteron sp. P3 Viviers, Koutsoukos, Silva-Telles & Bengtson, p. 426, Fig. 15, 10-11.

Material: 1 specimen.

Brief description: carapace of medium size, sub-rectangular to sub-ovoid in lateral view, inflated in dorsal view. LV larger than the RV, with a strong overlap in the dorsal margin. Greatest height and width at mid-length. Dorsal margin nearly straight to slightly convex, ventral margin convex, partially hidden by the pronounced ventrolateral expansion. Anterior margin sub-rounded, posterior triangular with a very developed caudal process in the upper third of the height. Surface strongly reticulated. Ventral region with parallel ribs.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Stratigraphic and geographic distribution: Turonian–Coniacian of Nigeria (Gebhardt, 1999a), Santonian–Campanian, Potiguar Basin, Brazil (Viviers et al., 2000; this work).

Remarks: Though only one carapace was recovered in the studied material, there is no doubt about its generic assignment. According to Alexander (1933) Eocytheropteron differs from Cytheropteron Sars, 1865, in being ventrally inflated, lacking a wing-like lateral expansion, and usually having a distinctly larger LV which overlaps the RV conspicuously along the dorsal margin. The species Eocytheropteron anteretroversicardinatum Andreu, 1991, recorded in the Aptian–Lower Turonian of Morocco is similar, but has a much more convex dorsal margin and a less developed ventrolateral expansion. The outline of "Cytheropteron sp." Reyment, 1960, from Turonian strata from Nigeria (Neufville, 1973b) and Coniacian of Nigeria (Reyment, 1960) is similar but the specimens are more convex in dorsal margin and have a well developed median rib, not present in the material recorded in the Potiguar Basin.

Genus Semicytherura Wagner, 1957

Semicytherura musacchioi Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov.

(Pl. 5 , figs. O-S)

Derivatio nominis: In honor of the late Argentinian micropaleontologist Dr. Eduardo Musacchio, for his important contribution to the study of ostracodes.

Material: 69 specimens.

Holotype: C, ULVG-10089 (Pl. 5, figs. O-P), sample 27.60 m.

Paratypes: ULVG-9921, ULVG-10098.

Dimensions: holotype: L: 0.370, H: 0.180, W: 0.160.

Paratypes: L: 0.314-0.350, H: 0.152-0.170, W: 0.143-0.152.

Type-locality: 9-MO-13-RN, coordinates UTM: 682595E / 9428410N (zone 24S), 27.60 m, Potiguar Basin, Brazil.

Diagnosis: A species of Semicytherura characterized by the very small and sub-rectangular carapace, maximum width in the anterior third, ventral margin slightly concave, surface with large reticula and deep post-ocular sulcus.

Description: carapace very small, sub-rectangular and elongate in lateral view, nearly lanceolate in dorsal view. Valves almost of the same size, with the LV overlapping the left one dorsally. Maximum width at anterior third. Dorsal margin almost straight, ventral margin with a small concavity in the mid-length. Anterior margin nearly straight, posterior margin triangular, with a caudal process slightly above the mid-height. Anterior region compressed. Surface with larger reticula. Eye tubercle pronounced. Post-ocular sulcus deep. Internal features not observed.

Sexual dimorphism: females more inflated than males.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: The differentiation between the genera Cytherura Sars, 1866, and Semicytherura Wagner, 1957, is based on differences in the hinge, marginal zone and marginal pore canals. We sustain the generic status of this species based on the ornamentation pattern. According to Whatley & Cusminsky (2010), Semicytherura varies considerably in shape, outline and ornamentation, from smooth to strongly costate, from punctate to tuberculate. Species of Cytherura, on the other hand, are all rather similar in shape and ornament and have smooth to punctate or delicately reticulate carapace ornament.

Semicytherura POT 1

(Pl. 6 , figs. A-B)

Material: 16 specimens.

Brief description: carapace very small, sub-rectangular in lateral view, sub-oval and narrow in dorsal view. LV overlaps the RV in the posterodorsal margin. Maximum width in the posterior third. Dorsal margin almost straight and with a subtle concavity at mid-length; ventral margin straight. Anterior margin nearly straight, posterior margin triangular, with caudal process slightly above the mid-height. Surface entirely covered by weak and large reticula, with dense and very small secondary reticulation. Eye tubercle and post-ocular sulcus present.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: Besides the similarity in the general lateral outline, this species differs from Semicytherura musacchioi sp. nov. in the ornamentation pattern and in the location of the maximum width, which is in the posterior third.

 Semicytherura POT 2

(Pl. 6 , figs. C-D)

Material: 5 specimens.

Description: carapace very small, sub-rectangular in lateral view, inflated in dorsal view. Valves nearly equal. Maximum height at the anterior cardinal angle; maximum width in the posterior third. Dorsal margin straight, ventral margin almost straight, with a concavity at mid-length. Anterior margin asymmetrically rounded, posterior margin triangular. Caudal process acuminate, situated in the upper third of the height. Surface ornamented by strong ribs. The ventral and dorsal ribs are parallel to the contiguous margins. In the anterior region there is a rib Y-shaped, connected to the ventral rib. In the middle of carapace the ribs are sinuous. Eye tubercle small.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: This species differs from the others identified in the Potiguar Basin by the strong ribs and the position of the caudal process.

Genus Vesticytherura Gründel, 1964

Vesticytherura? POT 1

(Pl. 6 , figs. E-G)

Material: 26 specimens.

Brief description: carapace very small, sub-rectangular in lateral and dorsal views. Valves nearly equal. Maximum height in front of the mid-length; maximum width at the posterior third. Dorsal margin straight, ventral margin convex. Anterior and posterior margins asymmetrically rounded, with the posterior one projected upwards. Presence of a strong and sinuous median rib, which develops three upturned curves (anterior, median and posterior) towards the dorsal region, defining two sulci in the dorsal region. Prominent eye tubercle. Sexual dimorphism present: males lower and more elongated than females.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: The genus Vesticytherura Gründel, 1964, was proposed to include species firstly belonging to Eucytherura, but with differences in pore canals number and in developed sulci on the external surface. Besides the absence of internal features, which were not observed, the external lateral and dorsal views and the other external characteristics of the Brazilian species are in accordance to the Vesticytherura diagnosis.

Family Trachyleberididae Sylvester-Bradley, 1948

Genus Langiella Fauth, Colin, Koutsoukos & Bengtson, 2005

Langiella POT 1

(Pl. 6 , figs. H-J)

Material: 12 specimens.

Brief description: carapace large, sub-rectangular in lateral view, sub-oval with the extremities very compressed in dorsal view. LV slightly overlaps the right one. Maximum height at anterior cardinal angle; maximum width in front of the mid-length. Dorsal margin almost straight sloping slightly posteriorly; ventral margin almost straight and subparallel to the dorsal margin. Anterior margin rounded, posterior margin rounded to sub-triangular. Surface reticulate, with reticula larger in the anterior region and absent in the posterior region. Presence of a weak dorsal rib and a strong ventral one, short and curved. Anteromarginal rib developed. Eye tubercle small. Internal features not observed. Sexual dimorphism probably present, with females more rounded and shorter.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: This species differs from Langiella reymenti Fauth, Colin, Koutsoukos & Bengtson, 2005 (Danian, Pernambuco-Paraíba Basin, Brazil) in the posterior margin, which is less rounded, without spines and in the ornamentation pattern, predominantly reticulated.

Genus Protocosta Bertels, 1969

Protocosta babinoti Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov.

(Pl. 6 , figs. K-P)

2000 Cythereis? sp. P8 Viviers, Koutsoukos, Silva-Telles & Bengtson, p. 433, Fig. 19, 3-4.

Derivatio nominis: In honor of the late Dr. Jean-François Babinot, for his important contribution to the study of Cretaceous ostracodes.

Material: 380 specimens.

Holotype: C, f, ULVG-10085 (Pl. 6, figs. K-L), sample 27.60 m.

Paratypes: ULVG-10086, ULVG-10061, ULVG-10056.

Dimensions: holotype: L: 0.740, H: 0.400, W: 0.390.

Paratypes: L: 0.740-0.920, H: 0.360-0.430, W: 0.370-0.410.

Type-locality: 9-MO-13-RN, coordinates UTM: 682595E / 9428410N (zone 24S), 27.60 m, Potiguar Basin, Brazil.

Diagnosis: A species of the genus Protocosta with the following characteristics: carapace large to very large, sub-rectangular in lateral view, with surface reticulated and three almost parallel ribs: dorsal, ventral and median; spines in the anterior and posteroventral margins.

Description: carapace large (females) to very large (males), sub-rectangular in lateral view, sub-oval with compressed extremities in dorsal view. LV overlaps the RV along all margins. Maximum height at anterior cardinal angle, maximum width in front of the mid-length, maximum length at mid-height. Dorsal margin almost straight and partially hidden by the dorsal rib; ventral margin almost straight, slightly concave anteriorly. Anterior margin broadly rounded, posterior margin sub-triangular. Anterior and posterior regions compressed. Surface strongly reticulated. Presence of three acute ribs, almost parallel in dorsal, ventral and median regions. The ventral rib is almost straight, the median rib is sinuous and subdued in its anterior part and the dorsal rib is convex. Anteromarginal rib well developed. Anterior and posteroventral margins with spines. Small eye tubercle present. Subcentral tubercle poorly developed. Internal features: LV with smooth posterior and anterior sockets and an elongate and narrow bar.

Sexual dimorphism: females shorter, more inflated and proportionally higher than males. The lateral ribs are more developed in the adult females.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: Protocosta struveae Bertels, 1969, recorded in the Paleogene from Argentina, is lower, more elongated, less inflated and with the lateral ribs less developed than P. babinoti sp. nov. The species Protocosta reticulata Fauth, Colin, Koutsoukos & Bengtson, 2005 (Maastrichtian of Pernambuco-Paraíba Basin, Brazil) has the posterior margin more rounded, the eye tubercle much more developed and the reticula more prominent.

 Protocosta POT 1

(Pl. 6 , figs. Q-S)

Material: 48 specimens.

Brief description: carapace of medium size, sub-rectangular in lateral view, sub-trapezoidal in dorsal view. LV larger than the right one, with overlap more pronounced in the dorsal margin. Greatest height at anterior cardinal angle, maximum width at posterior third, maximum length below mid-height. Dorsal margin straight, ventral margin slightly convex at mid-length. Anterior margin rounded, posterior margin triangular and acute. Surface strongly reticulated. Presence of three thin ribs: dorsal, median and ventral and marked tubercles near the posteroventral and posterodorsal regions. Anteromarginal rib developed. Subcentral and eye tubercles present.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: This species differs from Protocosta babinoti sp. nov. by the presence of tubercles in the posterodorsal and posteroventral regions, less developed ribs and the position of maximum length, which is below the mid-height.

Genus Paraplatycosta Dingle, 1971

Paraplatycosta aff. talayninensis Andreu, 1995

(Pl. 7 , figs. A-C)

aff. 1995 Paraplatycosta talayninensis Andreu, p. 108-109, Pl. 6, figs. 9-18.

Material: 10 specimens.

Brief description: carapace large, sub-rectangular in lateral view, very narrow in dorsal view. Left valve larger than the right one, with overlap more pronounced in the posterior margin. Greatest height at anterior cardinal angle, maximum width at anterior third. Dorsal margin almost straight, ventral margin slightly concave anteromedially. Anterior margin rounded, posterior margin sub-triangular. Surface covered by asymmetric reticulation; the reticula is smaller around the subcentral tubercle increasing towards the periphery. Anterior and posteroventral margins ornamented with stout spines. Anteromarginal and posteromarginal ribs well developed. Dorsal rib slightly convex. Subcentral and eye tubercles present.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: Besides the general outline similarity with P. talayninensis Andreu, 1995 (Upper Santonian, Morocco), the Brazilian species is more elongated, with asymmetrical reticula and posterior margin more acuminate.

Paraplatycosta POT 1

(Pl. 7 , figs. D-E)

Material: 1 specimen.

Brief description: carapace large, sub-rectangular in lateral view, very narrow in dorsal view. Left valve larger than the right one, with overlap more pronounced in the posterodorsal and anterodorsal margins. Maximum height at anterior cardinal angle, maximum width at anterior third. Dorsal margin slightly convex, ventral margin concave at mid-length. Anterior margin broadly rounded, posterior margin rounded to sub-triangular and angulate. Anterior, posterior and posteroventral regions compressed. Surface with scarce and asymmetrical reticulation, with different sizes: large near the periphery, decreasing in size towards the middle. Anteromarginal and posteromarginal ribs prominent; dorsal rib slightly convex, ventral rib short and strongly convex. Presence of strong spines in the anterior and posteroventral margins. Subcentral and eye tubercles well developed.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Remarks: This species was left in open nomenclature due to the scarcity of specimens. The rarity of the genus in the Brazilian margin and the particular ornamentation of this species justify its brief description. It differs from P. aff. talayninensis in having a different outline and ornamentation, particularly in what concerns the dorsal and ventral ribs.

Subfamily Brachycytherinae Puri, 1954

Genus Brachycythere Alexander, 1929

 "Brachycythere" aff. ilamensis Emami, 1989

(Pl. 7 , figs. F-H)

aff. 1989 Brachycythere ilamensis Emami, p. 611, Fig. B, 3-7.

2000 Brachycythere sp. P1 Viviers, Koutsoukos, Silva-Telles & Bengtson, p. 422, Fig. 12, 3-4.

Material: 68 specimens.

Brief description: carapace large, sub-triangular in lateral view, inflated in dorsal view. LV valve larger than RV along all margins. Maximum height at anterior cardinal angle, maximum width behind mid-length. Dorsal margin straight, ventral margin almost straight, partially hidden by the inflation of the carapace. Anterior margin obliquely rounded, posterior margin sub-triangular and strongly projected downwards. Anterior and posterior regions compressed. Presence of small eyespots, the left one more prominent. Lateral surface faintly punctated.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Stratigraphic and geographic distribution: Santonian–Campanian from Potiguar Basin, Brazil (Viviers et al., 2000; this work).

Remarks: This species is similar to B. ilamensis Emami, 1989, from the Campanian of Iran, but it is smaller, and has no denticles in the anterior margin. Moreover, in the Iranian species the ventrolateral expansion is less pronounced allowing to see the ventral margin. According to Puckett (2002) Brachycythere is restricted to North America and the brachycytherines of South America and Africa should belong to a different, but undescribed genus (Puckett & Colin, in prep.).

"Brachycythere" cf. angulata Grékoff, 1951

(Pl. 7 , figs. I-J)

cf. 1951 Brachycythere ledaforma angulata Grékoff, p. 58, Pl. 2, figs. 11-12.

Material: 8 specimens.

Brief description: carapace large, sub-triangular in lateral view, very inflated in dorsal view. LV valve larger than RV along all margins, more pronounced in the dorsal and ventral margins. Maximum height at anterior cardinal angle, maximum width at mid-length. Dorsal margin straight, ventral margin convex. Anterior margin broadly rounded, posterior margin sub-triangular and acuminate. Anterior and posterior regions compressed. Small and scarce spines in the posteroventral margin. Presence of large eyespots, the left one more prominent. Surface smooth.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Stratigraphic and geographic distribution: The species B. angulata Grékoff, 1951, was originally described in the Santonian from Cameroon and is very common in the Upper Cretaceous from West Africa and Asia Minor, for example: Coniacian–Campanian, Algeria (Glintzboeckel & Magné, 1959); Campanian–Maastrichtian, Senegal and Ivory Coast (Apostolescu, 1961); Coniacian–Campanian, Israel (Honigstein et al., 1985), Campanian, Oman (Babinot & Bourdillon de Grissac, 1989), Santonian–Campanian, Tunisia (Abdallah et al., 1995), Cenomanian–Campanian, Egypt (Bold, 1964; Morsi, 2000; El-Nady et al., 2008).

Remarks: Although very similar to B. angulata Grékoff, 1951, the specimens from Potiguar Basin are shorter and more inflated.

Subfamily Buntoniinae Apostolescu, 1961

Genus Soudanella Apostolescu, 1961

Soudanella laciniosa paucicostata Delicio, Coimbra & Carreño, 2000

(Pl. 7 , figs. K-N)

2000 Soudanella laciniosa paucicostata Delicio, Coimbra & Carreño, p. 339-340, Figs. 8.19-8.20.

2000 Protobuntonia aff. P. semicostellata Grékoff, 1951 - Viviers et al., p. 432, Figs. 18, 4-6

Material: 27 specimens.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Stratigraphic and geographic distribution: Santonian–Campanian, Potiguar Basin.

Soudanella semicostellata (Grékoff, 1951)

(Pl. 7 , figs. O-Q)

1951 Buntonia semicostellata Grékoff, p. 98, Pl. 2, figs. 16-19.

? 1960 Buntonia (P.) semicostellata (Grékoff).- Reyment, p. 164-166, Pl. 10, fig. 3.

1987 Buntonia (P.) semicostellata (Grékoff).- Okosun, p. 55-56, Pl. 18, figs. 1-2; Pl. 22, fig. 17.

1992 Protobuntonia semicostellata (Grékoff).- Okosun, p. 332, Pl. 2, figs. 1-2.

2000 Protobuntonia sp. P6 Viviers, Koutsoukos, Silva-Telles & Bengtson, p. 432, Fig. 18, 7-8.

Material: 39 specimens.

Age: Santonian–Campanian.

Stratigraphic and geographic distribution: Turonian–Santonian, Nigeria (Okosun, 1987, 1992); Coniacian, Nigeria (Reyment, 1960); Santonian–Campanian, Potiguar Basin, Brazil (Viviers et al., 2000; this work); Campanian, Cameroon (Grékoff, 1951).

Remarks: Although males have not been observed in the studied material, Okosun (1992) illustrated males, which are more elongated.

Subfamily Campylocytherinae Puri, 1960

Genus Leguminocythereis Howe, 1936

Leguminocythereis reymenti Neufville, 1973b

(Pl. 7 , figs. R-T)

1960 Leguminocythereis sp.- Reyment, p. 139, Pl. 7, fig. 6.

1973b Leguminocythereis reymenti Neufville, p. 49-50. Pl. 2, Fig. 3, 4a-b.

1973a Leguminocythereis reymenti Neufville - Neufville, p. 170-171, Pl. 8.4, fig. 1a-f.

1999a Leguminocythereis sp. Gebhardt, p. 89, Figs. 6.5-6.9.

2000 Leguminocythereis reymenti Neufville - Delicio et al., p. 430, Figs. 17, 1-2.

2000 Leguminocythereis aff. L. reymenti - Viviers et al., p. 340-341, Figs. 8.21-8.22.

Material: 16 specimens.

Age: Santonian.

Stratigraphic and geographic distribution: Turonian–Santonian, Nigeria (Reyment, 1960; Neufville, 1973a, 1973b; Gebhardt, 1999a); Santonian–?Campanian, Potiguar Basin, Brazil (Delicio et al., 2000; Viviers et al., 2000; this work).

Pl. 1
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Plate 1: Scale bar: 100 µm

A-D: Cytherella gambiensis Apostolescu, 1963. A: C, left view, f, ULVG-9840, sample 107.00 m, L: 0.635, H: 0.463, W: 0.360; B: C, left view, m, ULVG-9841, sample 143.90 m, L: 0.843, H: 0.570, W: 0.420; C: C, DV, m, ULVG-9842, sample 143.90 m, L: 0.837, H: 0.559, W: 0.446; D: RV, IV, ULVG-9843, sample 140.30 m, L: 0.869, H: 0.616.

E-I: Cytherella mediatlasica Andreu, 1996. E-F: morphotype 1, C, f, ULVG-10104, sample 27.60 m, L: 0.720, H: 0.390, W: 0.250, E: left view, F: DV; G-H: morphotype 2, C, f, ULVG-9847, sample 140.30 m; L: 0.660, H: 0.338, W: 0.230, G: DV, H: left view; I: morphotype 1, C, left view, m, ULVG-10137, sample 29.50 m, L: 0.720, H: 0.350, W: 0.210.

J-L: Cytherella aff. austinensis Alexander, 1929. J: C, left view, f, ULVG-9837, sample 140.30 m, L: 0.681, H: 0.490, W: 0.328; K: C, left view, m, ULVG-9838, sample 140.30 m, L: 0.723, H: 0.449, W: 0.303; L: C, DV, m, ULVG-9839, sample 140.30 m; L: 0.730, H: 0.439, W: 0.306.

M-P: Cytherella POT 1. M: C, left view, f, ULVG-9849, sample 140.30 m, L: 0.885, H: 0.569, W: 0.430; N: C, DV, f, ULVG-9850, sample 140.30 m, L: 0.844, H: 0.557, W: 0.485; O: RV, IV, ULVG-9851, sample 140.30 m, L: 0.846, H: 0.539; P: C, left view, m, ULVG-10407, sample 83.90 m, L: 0.820, H: 0.490, W: 0.400.

Q-R: Cytherelloidea POT 1. Q-R: C, ULVG-9853, sample 207.00 m, L: 0.694, H: 0.369, W: 0.270, Q: left view, R: DV.

Pl. 2
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Plate 2: Scale bar: 100 µm

A-C: Bairdoppilata POT 1. A-B: C, ULVG-9864, sample 81.10 m, L: 0.810, H: 0.526, W: 0.445, A: right view, B: left view, C: C, DV, ULVG-9863, sample 81.10 m, L: 0.894, H: 0.602, W: 0.464.

D-G: Neonesidea POT 1. D: C, right view, ULVG-9866, sample 74.40 m, L: 0.780, H: 0.491, W: 0.465; E: C, DV, ULVG-9867, sample 74.40 m, L: 0.786, H: 0.492, W: 0.478; F-G: C, ULVG-9868, sample 74.40 m, L: 0.740, H: 0.469, W: 0.452, F: right view, G: left view.

H-L: Triebelina anterotuberculata Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov. H: holotype, C, right view, ULVG-9860, sample 111.80 m, L: 0.940, H: 0.505, W: 0.409; I-K: paratype 1, C, juvenile, ULVG-9859, sample 81.90 m, L: 0.744, H: 0.416, W: 0.310, I: right view, J: DV, K: left view; L: paratype 2, C, juvenile, right view, ULVG-9860, sample 81.90 m, L: 0.860, H: 0.478, W: 0.360.

M-P: Triebelina obliquocostata Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov. M-O: holotype, C, ULVG- ULVG-9869, sample 74.40 m, L: 0.651, H: 0.378, W: 0.411, M: right view, N: DV, O: VV; P: paratype, C, left view, ULVG-9870, sample 74.40 m; L: 0.704, H: 0.400, W: 0.432.

Pl. 3
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Plate 3: Scale bar: 100 µm

A-C: Paracypris aff. posteriusacuminatus Andreu, 1996. A-C: C, ULVG-9880, sample 140.13 m, L: 0.874, H: 0.434, W: 0.368, A: right view, B: left view, C: DV.

D-I: Cophinia ovalis Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov. D: holotype, C, right view, f, ULVG- 10389, sample 30.40 m, L: 0.960, H: 0.700, W: 0.560; E: paratype 1, C, DV, f, ULVG- 10384, sample 40.65 m, L: 0.870, H: 0.620, W: 0.500; F-G: paratype 2, C, m, ULVG- 10390, sample 59.60 m, L: 0.920, H: 0.580, W: 0.440, F: right view, G: DV; H: paratype 3, LV, EV, f, ULVG- 10226, sample 39.60 m, L: 0.840, H: 0.600; I: paratype 4, LV, IV, f, ULVG- 10302, sample 50.00 m; L: 0.915, H: 0.649.

J-P: Fossocytheridea potiguarensis Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov. J: holotype, C, right view, f, ULVG-10181, sample 33.80 m, L: 1.060, H: 0.640, W: 0.540; K: paratype 1, C, DV, f, ULVG-10195, sample 34.05 m, L: 1.000, H: 0.600, W: 0.500; L: paratype 2, C, left view, f, ULVG-10184, sample 33.80 m, L: 0.960, H: 0.600, W: 0.470; M: paratype 3, C, right view, m, ULVG-10187, sample 33.80 m, L: 1.220, H: 0.660, W: 0.520; N: paratype 4, C, left view, m, ULVG-10169, sample 33.00 m, L: 1.040, H: 0.540, W: 0.460; O: paratype 5, C, DV, m, ULVG-10186, sample 33.80 m, L: 1.000, H: 0.640, W: 0.500, P: paratype 6, LV, IV, f, ULVG-10177, sample 33.80 m; L: 0.920, H: 0.580.

Pl. 4
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Plate 4: Scale bar: 100 µm

A-D: Fossocytheridea POT 1. A: C, right view, f, ULVG-10205, sample 38.00 m, L: 0.640, H: 0.380, W: 0.340; B-C: C, f, ULVG-10215, sample 39.60 m, L: 0.620, H: 0.360, W: 0.300, B: DV, C: left view; D: C, right view, m, ULVG-10168, sample 33.00 m, L: 0.690, H: 0.360, W: 0.300.

E-H: Fossocytheridea? POT 2. E-F: C, f, ULVG-10428, sample 75.30 m, L: 0.900, H: 0.540, W: 0.460, E: right view, F: DV; G: C, right view, juvenile, ULVG-10318, sample 55.50 m, L: 0.740, H: 0.480, W: 0.370; H: LV, IV, juvenile, ULVG-10330, sample 58.60 m, L: 0.780, H: 0.500.

I-M: Ovocytheridea anterocompressa Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov. I-K: holotype, C, f, ULVG-10283, sample 47.60 m, L: 0.840, H: 0.520, W: 0.400, I: right view, J: DV, K: left view; L: paratype 1, C, right view, m, ULVG-10237, sample 40.20 m, L: 0.780, H: 0.420, W: 0.320; M: paratype 2, LV, IV, f, ULVG-10160, sample 31.80 m, L: 0.700, H: 0.460.

N-R: Ovocytheridea triangularis Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov. N: holotype, C, right view, f, ULVG-10112, sample 27.90 m, L: 0.880, H: 0.600, W: 0.440; O: paratype 1, C, DV, f, ULVG-10119, sample 28.30 m, L: 0.800, H: 0.540, W: 0.440; P: paratype 2, C, left view, f, ULVG-10090, sample 27.60 m, L: 0.840, H: 0.600, W: 0.460; Q: paratype 3, C, right view, m, ULVG-10075, sample 26.70 m, L: 0.900, H: 0.480, W: 0.380, R: paratype 4, LV, IV, ULVG-10149, sample 30.20 m, L: 0.890, H: 0.560.

Pl. 5
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Plate 5: Scale bar: 100 µm (A-N); 50 µm (O-S)

A-D: Ovocytheridea cf. producta Grékoff, 1962. A-C: C, ULVG-9965, sample 140.30 m, L: 0.693, H: 0.415, W: 0.348, A: right view, B: DV, C: left view; D: RV, IV, ULVG-9966, sample 140.30 m, L: 0.700, H: 0.384.

E-I: Perissocytheridea jandairensis Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov. E: holotype, C, right view, f, ULVG-10193, sample 34.00 m, L: 0.540, H: 0.280, W: 0.380; F: paratype 1, C, DV, f, ULVG-10259, sample 46.05 m, L: 0.520, H: 0.280, W: 0.320; G: paratype 2, C, right view, m, ULVG-10179, sample 33.80 m, L: 0.610, H: 0.280, W: 0.340; H: paratype 3, C, DV, ULVG-10260, sample 46.05 m, L: 0.520, H: 0.240, W: 0.220; I: paratype 4, LV, IV, f, ULVG-10078, sample 34.00 m, L: 0.420, H: 0.220.

J-L: Eocytheropteron POT 1. J-K: C, f, ULVG-9900, sample 132.40 m, L: 0.458, H: 0.255, W: 0.271, J: right view, K: DV; L: C, right view, m, ULVG-9899, sample 140.30 m, L: 0.533, H: 0.256, W: 0.285.

M-N: Eocytheropteron POT 2. M-N: C, ULVG-9898, sample 140.13 m, L: 0.520, H: 0.270, W: 0.299, M: right view, N: DV.

O-S: Semicytherura musacchioi Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov. O-P: holotype, C, m, ULVG-10089, sample 27.60 m, L: 0.370, H: 0.180, W: 0.160, O: right view, P: VV; Q-R: C, f, ULVG-9921, sample 67.40 m, L: 0.314, H: 0.152, W: 0.143, Q: DV, R: left view; S: C, right view, f, ULVG-10098, sample 27.60 m, L: 0.350, H: 0.170, W: 0.152.

Pl. 6
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Plate 6: Scale bar: 50 µm (A-G); 100 µm (H-S)

A-B: Semicytherura POT 2. A-B: C, ULVG-10202, sample 37.10 m, L: 0.381, H: 0.180, W: 0.170, A: right view, B: DV.

C-D: Semicytherura POT 3. C-D: C, ULVG-9920, sample 81.90 m, L: 0.379, H: 0.175, W: 0.177, C: right view, D: DV.

E-G: Vesticytherura? POT 1. E, G: C, f, ULVG-9920, sample 53.95 m, L: 0.270, H: 0.190, W: 0.120; E: right view; F: C, right view, m, ULVG-10313, sample 54.90 m, L: 0.300, H: 0.150, W: 0.120; G: DV.

H-J: Langiella POT 1. H-I: C, f, ULVG-10284, sample 48.40 m, L: 0.720, H: 0.400, W: 0.350, H: right view, I: DV; J: C, right view, m, ULVG-10225, sample 39.60 m, L: 0.680, H: 0.340, W: 0.340.

K-P: Protocosta babinoti Piovesan, Cabral & Colin sp. nov. K-L: holotype, C, f, ULVG-10085, sample 27.60 m, L: 0.740, H: 0.400, W: 0.390, K: right view, L: DV; M-N: paratype 1, C, m, ULVG-10086, sample 27.60 m, L: 0.880, H: 0.410, W: 0.410, M: right view, N: DV; O: paratype 3, LV, IV, m, ULVG-10061, sample 26.40 m, L: 0.920, H: 0.430, P: paratype 4,C, left view, m, ULVG-10056, sample 26.25 m, L: 0.740, H: 0.360, W: 0.370.

Q-S: Protocosta POT 1. Q,S: C, ULVG-10290, sample 49.65 m, L: 0.700, H: 0.320, W: 0.300, Q: right view; R: C, left view; ULVG-10344, sample 59.60 m, L: 0.685, H: 0.320, W: 0.310; S: DV.

Pl. 7
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Plate 7: Scale bar: 100 µm

A-C: Paraplatycosta aff. talayninensis Andreu, 1995. A-B: C, ULVG-10130, sample 29.20 m, L: 0.740, H: 0.320, W: 0.210, A: right view, B: DV; C: C, left view, ULVG-10126, sample 29.20 m, L: 0.700, H: 0.310, W: 0.220.

D-E: Paraplatycosta POT 1. D-E: C, ULVG-10021, sample 140.13 m, L: 0.790, H: 0.310, W: 0.220, D: right view, E: DV.

F-H: "Brachycythere" cf. ilamensis Emami, 1989. F: C, right view, ULVG-10039, sample 81.90 m, L: 0.800, H: 0.490, W: 0.490; G: C, DV, ULVG-10441, sample 81.10 m, L: 0.720, H: 0.440, W: 0.440; H: C, left view, ULVG-10394, sample 81.90 m, L: 0.760, H: 0.480, W: 0.460.

I-J: "Brachycythere" cf. angulata Grékoff, 1951. I-J: C, ULVG-10117, sample 28.30 m, L: 0.820, H: 0.420, W: 0.500, I: right view, J: DV.

K-N: Soudanella laciniosa paucicostata Delicio, Coimbra & Carreño, 2000. K: C, right view, f, ULVG-10044, sample 140.30 m, L: 0.607, H: 0.365, W: 0.257; L: C, right view, m, ULVG-10045, sample 140.30 m, L: 0.790, H: 0.365, W: 0.312; M-N: C, m, ULVG-10046, sample 140.30 m, L: 0.779, H: 0.355, W: 0.294, M: left view, N: DV.

O-Q: Soudanella semicostellata (Grékoff, 1951). O-P: C, ULVG-10041, sample 149.95 m, L: 0.729, H: 0.401, W: 0.379, O: right view, P: DV; Q: C, left view, ULVG-10042, sample 140.13 m, L: 0.900, H: 0.474, W: 0.428.

R-T: Leguminocythereis reymenti Neufville, 1973b. R-T: C, f, ULVG-9982, sample 140.13 m, L: 0.917, H: 0.490, W: 0.490, R: right view S: DV; T: C, right view, m, ULVG-9983, sample 140.13 m, L: 1.152, H: 0.493, W: 0.492.

Appendix 1: Illustrated species.

This appendix (Pls. 8-10) includes the taxa that remained undetermined due to the scarcity, preservation, reduced stratigraphic value or even to the impossibility of inclusion in any taxon described up to now.

Pl. 8
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Plate 8: Scale bar: 100 µm (A-J); 50 µm (K-U)

A-B: Cytherella POT 2. A-B: C, ULVG-9852, sample 140.30 m, L: 0.820, H: 0.440, W: 0.300, A: left view, B: DV.

C-D: Bairdoppilata POT 2. C-D: C, ULVG-9862, sample 204.00 m, L: 0.740, H: 0.450, W: 0.434, C: right view, D: DV.

E-F: Paracypris POT 5. E-F: C, ULVG-10139, sample 29.70 m, L: 0.530, H: 0.360, W: 0.220, E: right view, F: DV.

G-H: "Bythocypris" POT 1. G-H: C, ULVG-10131, sample 29.50 m, L: 0.600, H: 0.310, W: 0.200, G: right view, H: DV.

I-J: Ovocytheridea POT 1. I-J: C, ULVG-9972, sample 204.00 m, L: 815, H: 0.530, W: 0.420, I: DV, J: right view.

K-L: Acuminacythere? POT 2. K-L: C, ULVG-10122, sample 28.45 m, L: 0.310, H: 0.180, W: 0.140, K: right view, L: DV.

M-N: Eucytherura aff. speluncosus (Andreu, 1995). M-N: C, ULVG-10400, sample 81.90 m, L: 0.412, H: 0.216, W: 0.200, M: right view, N: DV.

O: Kroemmelbeinella? POT 1. O: C, right view, ULVG-10315, sample 54.90 m, L: 0.520, H: 0.300, W: 0.340.

P-Q: Metacytheropteron? POT 2. P-Q: C, ULVG-9905, sample 85.15 m, L: 0.445, H: 0.220, W: 0.260, P: right view, Q: DV.

R-S: Metacytheropteron? POT 3. R-S: C, ULVG-9907, sample 74.40 m, L: 0.480, H: 0.260, W: 0.240, R: DV, S: right view.

T-U: Microceratina? POT 1. T-U: C, ULVG-10245, sample 41.30 m, L: 0.450, H: 0.210, W: 0.290, T: right view, U: DV.

Pl. 9
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Plate 9: Scale bar: 50 µm (A-C; R-U); 100 µm (D-Q)

A: Pelecocythere POT 2. A: C, right view, ULVG-10124, sample 29.20 m, L: 380, H: 0.130, W: 0.185.

B: Phlyctocythere? POT 2. B: C, right view, ULVG-10121, sample 28.45 m, L: 0.480, H: 0.260, W: 0.165.

C: Sagmatocythere? POT 1. C: C, right view, ULVG-9928, sample 62.30 m, L: 0.279, H: 0.158, W: 0.145

D-E: Soudanella POT 1. D-E: C, ULVG-10043, sample 140.30 m, L: 0.742, H: 0.400, W: 0.340, D: right view, E: DV.

F: Leguminocythereis? POT 1. F: C, right view, ULVG-9984, sample 207.00 m, L: 1.050, H: 0.505, W: 0.490.

G-H: Deroocythere? POT 1. G-H: C, ULVG-9985, sample 140.30 m, L: 0.706, H: 0.335, W: 0.302, G: DV, H: right view.

I-J: Trachyleberididae indet. gen. 2. I-J: C, ULVG-10022, sample 185.50 m, L: 0.720, H: 0.320, W: 0.340, I: right view, J: DV.

K: Trachyleberididae indet. gen. 3. K: C, left view, ULVG-10334, sample 58.60 m, L: 0.650, H: 0.305, W: 290.

L-M: Trachyleberididae indet. gen. 4. L-M: C, ULVG-10372, sample 74.70 m, L: 0.940, H: 0.430, W: 0.375, L: DV, M: right view.

N-O: Trachyleberididae indet. gen. 5. N-O: C, ULVG-10366, sample 75.30 m, L: 0.840, H: 0.410, W: 0.400, N: DV, O: right view.

P-Q: Trachyleberididae indet. gen. 6. P-Q: C, ULVG-10141, sample 29.70 m, L: 0.720, H: 0.360, W: 0.320, P: right view, Q: DV.

R-S: Xestoleberis POT 2. R-S: C, ULVG-10381, sample 82.70 m, L: 0.370, H: 0.180, W: 0.230, R: right view, S: DV.

T-U: Xestoleberis POT 3. T-U: C, ULVG-10070, sample 26.70 m, L: 0.410, H: 0.260, W: 0.242, T: right view, U: DV.

Pl. 10
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Plate 10: Scale bar: 50 µm (A-D; I-L); 100 µm (E-H)

A-B: Indet. gen. 3 POT 2. A-B: C, ULVG-9906, sample 74.40 m, L: 0.440, H: 0.221, W: 0.280, A: right view, B: DV.

C-D: Indet. gen. 4 POT 2. C-D: C, ULVG-9922, sample 60.20 m, L: 0.540, H: 0.265, W: 0.295, C: right view, D: DV.

E-F: Indet. gen. 5 POT 2. E-F: C, ULVG-9876, sample 74.40 m, L: 0.790, H: 0.470, W: 0.340, E: right view, F: DV.

G-H: Indet. gen. 6 POT 1. G: C, right view, m, ULVG-10282, sample 47.60 m, L: 0.810, H: 0.450, W: 0.310; H: C, DV, f, ULVG-10351, 60.20 m, L: 0.740, H: 0.442, W: 0.390.

I-J: Indet. gen. 7 POT 1. I-J: C, ULVG-10380, sample 74.40 m, L: 0.360, H: 0.200, W: 0.330, I: right view, J: DV.

K-L: Indet. gen. 8 POT 1. K: C, right view, ULVG-10297, sample 50.00 m, L: 0.430, H: 0.260, W: 0.260; L: C, DV, ULVG-10311, sample 54.90 m, L: 0.440, H: 0.250, W: 0.275.

5. Distribution of ostracodes and paleoecology

The Santonian–Campanian fauna of the Potiguar Basin is represented by 64 taxa, including nine new species (Fig. 3 ; Appendix 2 ). In general, it records diversified shallow water assemblages, at the base of the well. At some levels, typical mixohaline assemblages are present and towards the top the marine fauna is reestablished, but poorly diversified and with high dominance. The Shannon diversity and dominance values vary along the studied interval, characterizing environmental fluctuations (Fig. 4 ).

The interval 207 m - 79.50 m is exclusively represented by marine species, some of them with long range (e.g., Cytherella gambiensis, Brachycythere aff. ilamensis, Cophinia ovalis sp. nov.). Thirty-three taxa are identified in this interval, being the Platycopida the dominant taxa (52%), represented by the species Cytherella aff. austinensis, Cytherella gambiensis and Cytherella mediatlasica. Some authors (e.g., Lethiers & Whatley, 1994; Whatley et al., 2003; Corbari et al., 2005; Fauth & Koutsoukos, 2007; Gebhardt & Zorn, 2008) claimed that dominance of platycopids in ostracode assemblages could be regarded as a signal of dysaerobic conditions on the sea floor, based on the idea that the filter feeding platycopids, being able to pass more water over their respiratory surface were better adapted to survive in waters of reduced oxygen concentration. More recently, Brandão & Horne (2009), based on evidence from living ostracodes, established that platycopids are only occasionally dominant in levels of reduced oxygen, but frequently they are not. In this specific interval, the platycopids, although dominant, occur associated with many marine species and probably do not indicate low oxygen levels. Another factor that reinforces this hypothesis is the presence of Brachycythere, a genus that does not tolerate low oxygen levels (Gebhard & Zorn, 2008).

Based on the faunal composition, we infer an inner-outer platform environment for this first interval (207 m - 79.50 m). Although the faunal association indicates shallow water, some evidence suggests that depth may have varied along this range, particularly in the interval 143.90 m - 79.50 m, with a higher diversity (average of 1.60), lower dominance and presence of typical marine stenohaline ostracodes. The morphological variation in specimens of Eucytherura aff. speluncosus, which have eye tubercles less developed than the specimens at the top of the well and are associated with brackish species, points to deeper water. Additionally, Soudanella semicostellata and Leguminocythereis reymenti have been found in upper bathyal environment in the Upper Cretaceous of Nigeria (Gebhardt, 1999a).

The same environment of inner-outer platform seems to occur in the interval at 76 m-73.65 m, directly above this first one but the number of species and abundance decrease (16 taxa, distributed among 158 specimens). Other dominant taxa are: Neonesidea POT 1, indet. gen. 7 POT 1 and Cytherella gambiensis.

From the depth 73.40 m upwards, the fauna is dominated by cytherideids, indicating shallower waters. Following a trend of establishment of mixohaline conditions, from 46.60 m, there is a reduction in diversity (average of 1.07) and the typically mixohaline genera Fossocytheridea and Perissocytheridea occur in great abundance. In some levels (e.g., 33.80 m), the association of Fossocytheridea/Perissocytheridea represents almost 90% of the specimens and, in other levels, it is associated with some marine species such as Protocosta babinoti sp. nov. and Cophinia ovalis sp. nov. Previous studies have demonstrated that the association of Fossocytheridea/Perissocytheridea is characteristic of marginal marine environments (Colin et al., 1996; Tibert et al., 2002, 2003, 2009; Morsi & Wendler, 2010; Bergue et al., 2011). The species Ovocytheridea anterocompressa sp. nov. is also very abundant in this association, reinforcing the genus Ovocytheridea as an important indicator of marginal marine environment, as had been discussed by Rosenfeld & Raab (1974), Shahin (1991) and El-Nady et al. (2008).

In the interval 29.85 m - 26.20 m, a marine fauna is established again, with the dominance of Cophinia ovalis sp. nov., Ovocytheridea triangularis sp. nov., and Cytherella aff. austinensis. Some species are noteworthy because of their ecology, in special Cophinia ovalis sp. nov. and Ovocytheridea triangularis sp. nov. The former species is widely distributed and seems to be euryhaline, due to its association with both marine and mixohaline species; Ovocytheridea triangularis sp. nov. is a recurrent species in the marine intervals, but does not occur at mixohaline levels, differing from the distribution of Ovocytheridea anterocompressa sp. nov.

The changes in faunal composition are probably related to sea-level variations, proposed for this well by Monteiro & Faria (1988) and Córdoba (2001). The mixohaline assemblage occurs in intertidal/supra-tidal and lagoonal facies and the marine assemblages are mainly present in bar facies intercalated with lagoonal facies, as proposed by the above cited authors.

Fig. 3
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Figure 3: Distribution of the ostracode species, showing the different assemblages according to their ecological preferences. The symbol s means that the species occur also in older ages of the same well, according to Piovesan et al. (2014).

Fig. 4
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Figure 4: Shannon diversity and dominance indexes in the studied interval.

Appendix 2
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Appendix 2: Distribution of the ostracode species, with their abundances.

6. Paleogeography

Ostracodes can migrate latitudinally when temperature and other ecological parameters, such as the bathymetry, remain stable within certain limits, and continental margins can act as migration pathways (Babinot & Colin, 1992). The Titterton & Whatley (1988) work on biogeography of Cenozoic and Recent faunas of the Indo-Pacific stated that the species were usually dispersed by a combination of active migration along continental platforms and passive migration by ocean currents. These elementary concepts are important to reconstruct the migration patterns of the studied fauna.

The endemism of the assemblages is stronger in the Santonian–Campanian than in the Turonian interval (Piovesan et al., 2014), and seems to reflect essentially the paleobathymetry, since in the Santonian–Campanian the oceanic conditions were already well established (Reyment, 1980; Babinot & Colin, 1992; Basile et al., 2005). Koutsoukos & Kalsz (2000), based on benthic foraminifers, stated that a maximum paleobathymetry occurred in Late Cretaceous, precisely during the Campanian. Although the oceanic conditions were not as favorable for the migration of ostracodes as in the Turonian, the Santonian–Campanian ostracode faunas from Potiguar Basin have six species in common with the West and North Africa, indicating that the faunal exchange between these regions was still occurring (Fig. 5 ).

The migration of common species between Potiguar Basin and African basins seems to have occurred preferentially from Africa to Brazil. This hypothesis, however, may be biased by the scarcity of detailed taxonomic studies.

Cytherella aff. austinensis was firstly recorded in Cenomanian deposits of Morocco (Andreu, 1991) and Gabon (Neufville, 1973a) and then migrated to the Northeast Brazil (Delicio et al., 2000; this work). The migration of Cytherella aff. austinensis in the Turonian–Santonian of Egypt may have occurred through two routes: via Trans-Saharan Seaway, which allowed the communication of benthic faunas between West and North Africa until the Turonian (Gebhard, 1999c) or through the continuous carbonate platform present in Northwest and North Africa (Andreu, 1993; Andreu et al., 2013). The second route seems to have been followed by Cytherella gambiensis, Cytherella mediatlasica, Eocytheropteron POT 2, Soudanella semicostellata, and Leguminocythereis reymenti.

Cytherella gambiensis was firstly recorded in the Turonian of Algeria (Vivière, 1985) and then migrated to Gambia, where it is recorded in the Senonian, and to Potiguar Basin, where it was found in the Coniacian–Campanian (Delicio et al., 2000; Viviers et al., 2000; this work). Cytherella mediatlasica occurs in the Turonian–Santonian of Nigeria (Okosun, 1987, 1992), the Santonian of Morocco (Andreu, 1996) and the Turonian–Campanian of Potiguar Basin, Brazil (Viviers et al., 2000; this work). Eocytheropteron POT 2 was recorded in the Turonian–Coniacian of Nigeria (Gebhardt, 1999a) and the Santonian–Campanian of the Potiguar Basin (Viviers et al., 2000; this work). The species Soudanella semicostellata occurs in the Turonian–Santonian of Nigeria (Reyment, 1960; Okosun, 1987, 1992), the Santonian–Campanian of Potiguar Basin (Viviers et al., 2000; this work) and the Campanian of Cameroon (Grékoff, 1951). Leguminocythereis reymenti occurs in the Turonian–Santonian of Nigeria (Reyment, 1960; Neufville, 1973a, 1973b; Gebhardt, 1999a) and also in the Upper Cretaceous (Delicio et al., 2000) and the Santonian (Viviers et al., 2000; this work) of the Potiguar Basin.

Fig. 5
Click on thumbnail to enlarge the image.

Figure 5: Paleogeographic distribution of some species recorded in Potiguar Basin during the Santonian–Campanian (Campanian map after Smith et al., 1994).

The similarities with the Late Cretaceous Caribbean fauna are very weak and reduced to the presence of pandemic genera. The genera shared with Late Cretaceous of Jamaica include Cytherella, Cytherelloidea, Paracypris, Brachycythere, Xestoleberis and Eucytherura (see revision in Puckett et al., 2012). On the other hand, two common genera in Northeast Brazil, Protocosta and Soudanella, do not occur in Jamaica. The presence of Ovocytheridea in Jamaica is an exception, since this genus is recorded mostly in the Upper Cretaceous of African basins with rare occurrences in Brazil and in the Middle East (Puckett et al., 2012). A similar Jamaican distribution was observed in Cuba by Lübimova & Sánchez-Arango (1974) who only recorded the genera Cytherella, Cytherelloidea, Bairdoppilata and Brachycythere in Campanian–Maastrichtian strata. This faunal endemism could be attributed to the increased water depth over the Atlantic Ocean during the Late Cretaceous (Pletsch et al., 2001).

Although the migration of some marine genera occurred from South to North Atlantic, as demonstrated by Dingle (1988, 1999) and Piovesan et al. (2012), the similarities are reduced during the Late Cretaceous. The affinities with the "Pan Gondwana Fauna" proposed by Dingle (1988) are limited to the presence of the opportunistic genus "Brachycythere". This demonstrates that during the Santonian–Campanian, the migration from South Atlantic was highly restricted, possibly due to the increased depth or controlled by latitude-related thermal gradients (Seeling et al., 2004).

All the recorded data corroborate either the existence of a 'Brazil-Central-West Africa Province', as proposed by Tambareau (1982), or the extension of the Afro-Arabian Province of Babinot & Colin (1992).

7. Conclusions

Sixty-four ostracode taxa are recorded in the Santonian-Campanian Jandaíra Formation in the Potiguar Basin, including nine new species.

The faunal association mainly indicates marine environments, from inner to outer platform that responded to variations in the water depth. In some intervals typical brackish assemblages were recognized. Ovocytheridea can be considered a euryhaline genus, with species occurring in marine environments and other associated with brackish taxa. Morphological variations in Cytherella mediatlasica and Eucytherura aff. speluncosus are related especially to changes in salinity, chemical composition and depth of sea waters.

The endemism is strong in the studied interval, which appears to be closely related to the increase in water depth. The ostracode faunas from Potiguar Basin have six species in common with the West and North Africa, and the migration seems to have occurred preferentially from Africa to Brazil.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Narendra Kumar Srivastava (UFRN) for his help in the field activities, Ana Cristina Azerêdo (Universidade de Lisboa) for the help in revising the text, Rogério Martins (Petrobras-Cenpes/DIVEX) and Michele Goulart (ITTFOSSIL, Unisinos) for the SEM work. The first author thanks Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior for the research grant received during the development of this study (CAPES/PDSE, Proc. nº 18919/12-0). Finally, we are greatly indebted to Marta Claudia Viviers (Petrobras-Cenpes/DIVEX), without whom this study would not have been possible. Gerson Fauth thanks CNPq (The Brazilian Scientific and Technology Developing Council) for the grant (proc. 308544/2012-9). T.M. Puckett and J. Rodriguez-Lázaro are thanked for their detailed critical reviews of the manuscript.

Bibliographic references

Abdallah H., Memmi L., Damotte R., Rat P. & Magniez-Janin F. (1995).- Le Crétacé de la chaîne nord des Chotts (Tunisie du centre-sud), biostratigraphie et comparaison avec les régions voisines.- Cretaceous Research, London, vol. 16, p. 487-538.

Alexander C.I. (1929).- Ostracoda of the Cretaceous of North Texas.- University of Texas Bulletin, Austin, nº 2907, 144 p.

Alexander C.I. (1932).- Sexual dimorphism in fossil Ostracoda.- American Midland Naturalist, Notre Dame, vol. 13, nº 5, p. 302-311.

Alexander C.I. (1933).- Shell structure of the ostracode genus Cytheropteron, and fossil species from the Cretaceous of Texas.- Journal of Paleontology, Ithaca, vol. 7, nº 2, p. 181-214.

Andreu B. (1991).- Les ostracodes du Crétacé moyen (Barrémien à Turonien), le long d'une transversale Agadir-Nador (Maroc).- Strata, Toulouse, (Série 2), vol. 14, 765 p.

Andreu B. (1993).- Associations d'Ostracodes des marges téthysiennes et atlantiques marocaines de l'Albien au Turonien.- Geobios, Villeurbanne, vol. 26, nº1, p. 69-84.

Andreu B. (1995).- Trachyleberididae (Ostracodes) du Turonien supérieur (?)- Santonien de la région de Boulmane, Moyen Atlas (Maroc) : Systématique et biostratigraphie.- Revista Española de Micropaleontologia, Madrid, vol. 27, nº 1, p. 85-142.

Andreu B. (1996).- Nouvelles espèces d'ostracodes du Turonien supérieur (?) - Coniacien (?) - Santonien de la région de Boulmane, Moyen Atlas, Maroc. Systématique, biostratigraphie et paléoécologie, paléobiogéographie des associations. In: Jardiné S., Klasz I. & Debenay J.-P. (eds.), Géologie de l'Afrique et de l'Atlantique Sud.- Actes des Colloques de Géologie d'Angers, 1994, Pau, p. 483-509.

Andreu B., Lebedel V., Wallez M.-J., Lézin C. & Ettachfini M. (2013).- The upper Cenomanian-lower Turonian carbonate platform of the Preafrican Trough, Morocco: Biostratigraphic, paleoecological and paleobiogeographical distribution of ostracods.- Cretaceous Research, London, vol. 45, p. 216-246.

Apostolescu V. (1961).- Contribution à l'étude paléontologique (Ostracodes) et stratigraphique des bassins crétacés et tertiaires de l'Afrique Occidental.- Revue de l'Institut Français du Pétrole, Rueil-Malmaison, vol. 16, nº 7-8, p. 779-867.

Apostolescu V. (1963).- Essai de zonation par les Ostracodes dans le Crétacé du bassin du Sénégal.- Revue de l'Institut Français du Pétrole, Rueil-Malmaison, vol. 18, nº 12, p. 1675-1694.

Araripe P.T. & Feijó F.J. (1994).- Bacia Potiguar.- Boletim de Geociências da Petrobras, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 8, nº 1, p. 127-141.

Babinot J.-F. & Bourdillon de Grissac C. (1989).- Associations d'ostracodes de l'Albien-Maastrichtien du Dhofar (Oman) : affinités paléobiogéographiques et implications géodynamiques.- Bulletin de la Société géologique de France, Paris, vol. 8, nº 2, 287-294.

Babinot J.-F. & Colin J.-P. (1992).- Marine ostracode provincialism in the Late Cretaceous of the Tethyan realm and the austral province.- Palæogeography, Palæoclimatology, Palæoecology, Amsterdam, vol. 233, p.  63-95.

Basile C., Mascle J. & Guiraud R. (2005).- Phanerozoic geological evolution of the Equatorial Atlantic domain.- Journal of African Earth Sciences, Oxford, vol. 43, p. 275-282.

Bellion Y., Donze P. & Guiraud, R. (1973).- Répartition stratigraphique des principaux ostracodes (Cytheracea) dans le Crétacé supérieur du Sud-Ouest constantinois (confins Hodna - Aurès, Algérie du Nord).- Bulletin du Service géologique de l'Algérie, Boumerdès, (Nouvelle Série), vol. 44, p. 7-44.

Bergue C.T., Fauth G., Vieira C.E.L., Santos A.S. & Viviers M.C. (2011).- New species of Fossocytheridea Swain & Brown, 1964 (Ostracoda, Crustacea) in the Upper Cretaceous of Santos Basin, Brazil.- Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 14, nº 2, p. 149-156.

Bertels A. (1969).- Micropaleontología y estratigrafía del límite Cretácico-Terciario en Huantrai-co (Provincia de Neuquén). Ostracoda, Parte 2.- Ameghiniana, Buenos Aires, vol. 6, nº 4, p. 253-290.

Bismuth H., Boltenhagen C., Donze P., Le Fevre J. & Saint-Marc P. (1981).- Le Crétacé moyen et supérieur du Djebel Semmama (Tunisie du Centre-Nord).- Bulletin des Centres de Recherches Exploration-Production elf Aquitaine, Pau, vol. 5, p. 193-267.

Bold W.A. (1964).- Ostracoden aus der Oberkreide von Abu Rawash, Agypten.- Palaeontographica, Stuttgart, Abteilung A, vol. 123, p. 111-136.

Brandão S.N. & Horne D.J. (2009).- The Platycopid signal of oxygen depletion in the ocean: a critical evaluation of the evidence from modern ostracod biology, ecology and depth distribution.- Palæogeography, Palæoclimatology, Palæoecology, Amsterdam, vol. 283, p. 126-133.

Brito I.M. (1976).- História geológica das bacias sedimentares do Nordeste do Brasil.- Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 48, nº 3, p. 463-474.

Carbonel P., Cabral M.C. & Danielopol D.L. (2013).- Jean-Paul Colin.- Carnets de Géologie [Notebooks on Geology], Brest, Obituary Notice (Jean-Paul_Colin), p. 325-345.

Colin J.-P. & Lauverjat J. (1978).- Nouveaux Bairdiidae ornés (Ostracoda) dans le Crétacé supérieur du Portugal. In: Événements de la partie moyenne du Crétacé (Projet nº 58 du P.I.C.G.- U.N.E.S.C.O./ I.U.G.S.), Symposium de Soria (19 et 20 septembre 1977).- Cahiers de Micropaléontologie, Paris, 3, p. 105-112.

Colin J.-P., Tambareau Y. & Krasheninikov V.A. (1996).- Ostracodes limniques et lagunaires dans le Crétacé supérieur du Mali (Afrique de l'Ouest) : systématique, paléoécologie et affinités paléobiogéographiques.- Revue de Micropaléontologie, Paris, vol. 39, nº 3, p. 211-222.

Corbari L., Mesmer-Dudons N., Carbonel P. & Massabuau J.C. (2005).- Cytherella as a tool to reconstruct deep-sea paleo-oxygen levels: the respiratory physiology of the platycopid ostracod Cytherella cf. abyssorum.- Marine Biology, Berlin, vol. 147, nº 6, p. 1377-1386.

Córdoba V.C. (2001).- A evolução da plataforma carbonática Jandaíra durante o Neocretáceo na Bacia Potiguar: análise paleoambiental, diagenética e estratigráfica.- Tese de Doutorado, Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas, UNESP, Rio Claro, 239 p.

Delicio M.P., Coimbra J.C. & Carreño A.L. (2000).- Cretaceous marine Ostracoda from the Potiguar Basin, northeastern Brazil.- Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Palaöntologie, Abhandlungen, Sttutgart, vol. 215, nº 3, p. 321-345.

Dingle R.V. (1988).- Marine ostracod distributions during the early breakup of Southern Gondwanaland. In: Hanai T., Ikeya N. & Ishizaki K. (eds.), Evolutionary biology of ostracodes. Its fundamentals and applications.- Development in Palaeontology and Stratigraphy, Amsterdam, 11, p. 841-854.

Dingle R.V. (1999).- Walvis Ridge barrier: its influence on palaeoenvironments and source rock generation deduced from ostracod distributions in the early South Atlantic Ocean. In: Cameron N.R., Bate R.H. & Clure V.S. (eds.), The oil and gas habitats of the South Atlantic.- Geological Society, Special Publication, London, nº 153, p. 479-492.

El-Nady H.I., Abu Zied R.A. & Ayyad S. (2008).- Cenomanian–Maastrichtian ostracodes from Gabal Arif El-Naga anticline, Eastern Sinai, Egypt.- Revue de Paléobiologie, Genève vol. 27, nº 2, p. 533-573.

Emami V. (1989).- Upper Cretaceous Brachycythere (Ostr., Crust.) from Iran.- Journal of African Earth Sciences, Oxford, vol. 9, nº 3/4, p. 609-616.

Fauth G., Colin J.-P., Koutsoukos E.A. & Bengtson P. (2005).- Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary ostracodes from the Poty Quarry, Pernambuco, Northeastern Brazil.- Journal of South American Earth Sciences, Oxford, vol. 19, p. 285-305.

Fauth G. & Koutsoukos E.A.M. (2007).- Indícios de possível crise ambiental no limite Cretáceo-Paleogeno a partir da ocorrência do gênero Cytherella (Ostracoda) na Pedreira Poty (PE).- Paleontologia: Cenários de Vida, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 2, p. 433-442.

Gebhardt H. (1999a).- Cenomanian to Coniacian ostracodes from the Nkalagu area (SE Nigeria): biostratigraphy and palaeoecology.- Paläontologische Zeitschrift, Sttutgart, vol. 73, nº 1/2, p. 77-98.

Gebhardt H. (1999b).- Occurrence and palaeoecology of Cenomanian to Turonian ostracods from Ashaka (NE Nigeria).- Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, Sttutgart, vol. 211, nº 1/2, p. 133-149.

Gebhardt H. (1999c).- Cenomanian to Coniacian biogeography and migration of North and West African ostracods.- Cretaceous Research, London, vol. 20, p. 215-229.

Gebhardt H. & Zorn I. (2008).- Cenomanian ostracods of the Tarfaya upwelling region (Morocco) as palaeoenvironmental indicators.- Revue de Micropaléontologie, Paris, vol. 51, nº 4, p. 273-286.

Glintzboeckel C. & Magné J. (1959).- Répartition des microfaunes à plancton et à ostracodes dans le Crétacé supérieur de la Tunisie et de l'Est algérien.- Revue de Micropaléontologie, Paris, vol. 2, nº 2, p. 57-67.

Grékoff N. (1951).- Quelques ostracodes nouveaux du Sénonien supérieur du Cameroun.- Revue de l'Institut Français du Petrole et Annales des Combustibles liquides, Paris, vol. 6, p. 53-59.

Grékoff N. (1962).- Sur le genre d'ostracodes Ovocytheridea Grékoff, 1951.- Revue de Micropaléontologie, Paris, vol. 5, nº 2, p. 115-122.

Grosdidier E. (1979).- Principaux Ostracodes marins de l'intervalle Aptien-Turonien du Gabon (Afrique Occidentale).- Bulletin des Centres de Recherches Exploration-Production elf Aquitaine, Pau, vol. 3, nº 1, p. 1-35.

Gründel J. (1964).- Neue Ostracoden aus der deutschen Unterkreide. I.- Monatsberichte der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Berlin, vol. 6, nº 10, p. 743-749.

Hammer Ø. & Harper D.A.T. (2006).- Paleontological data analysis.- Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 351 p.

Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T. & Ryan P.D. (2001).- PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis.- Palaeontologia Electronica, Columbia, vol. 4, nº 1, p. 1-9.

Honigstein A., Raab M. & Rosenfeld A. (1985).- Manual of Cretaceous ostracodes from Israel.- Geological Survey of Israel, Special Publication, Jerusalem, nº 5, p. 1-25.

Horne D.J. (2005).- Ostracoda. In: Selley R.C., Cocks R.M. & Plimer I.R. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Geology.- Elsevier, Oxford, p. 453-463.

Koutsoukos E.A.M. & Klasz I. (2000).- Late Cretaceous foraminiferal biogeography (Families Bolivinidae, Buliminellidae, Gavelinellidae, Siphogenerinoididae, Turrilinidae) in northeastern Brazilian shelf and central West African basins.- Cretaceous Research, London, vol. 21, p. 381-405.

Krömmelbein K. (1964).- Brachycythere (Brachycythere) sapucariensis n.sp. aus dem Turonium.- Senckenbergiana lethaea, Frankfurt, vol. 45, p. 489-495.

Krömmelbein K. (1966a).- On ''Gondwana Wealden'' Ostracoda from NE Brazil and West Africa. In: Van Hinte J.E. (ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd West African Micropaleontological Colloquium.- E.J. Brill, Leiden, p. 113-118.

Krömmelbein K. (1966b).- Preliminary remarks on some marine Cretaceous ostracodes from Northeastern Brazil and West Africa. Proceedings of the 2nd West African Micropalaeontological Colloquium.- E.J. Brill, Leiden, p. 119-123.

Krömmelbein K. (1967).- Ostracoden aus der marinen ''Küsten-Kreide Brasiliens'': 2. Sergipella transatlantica n.gen. n.sp. und Aracajuia benderi n.gen. n.sp., aus dem Ober-Aptium/Albium.- Senckenbergiana Lethaea, Frankfurt, vol. 48, p. 525-533.

Lethiers F. & Whatley R.C. (1994).- The use of Ostracoda to reconstruct the oxygen levels of Late Palaeozoic oceans.- Marine Micropaleontology, Amsterdam, vol. 24, nº 1, p. 57-69.

Lübimova P.S. & Sánchez-Arango J.R. (1974). Los ostrácodos del Cretácico superior y del Terciario de Cuba.- Instituto Cubano del Libro, La Habana, 171 p.

Majoran S. (1989).- Mid-Cretaceous Ostracoda of northeastern Algeria.- Fossils and Strata, Oslo, vol. 27, p. 1-67.

Mohriak W.U. (2003).- Bacias Sedimentares da Margem Continental Brasileira. In: Bizzi L.A., Schobbenhaus C., Vidotti R.M. & Gonçalves J.H. (eds.), Geologia, tectônica e recursos minerais do Brasil.- CPRM, Brasília, p. 87-94.

Monteiro M.C. & Faria R.T. (1988).- Planície de maré no poço 9-MO-13-RN, Formação Jandaíra - um exemplo do passado.- Anais do XXXV Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia, Belém, nº 2, p. 809-823.

Morsi A.M. (2000).- Senonian ostracodes from east-central Sinai, Egypt. Biostratigraphic and paleogeographic implications.- Revue de Micropaléontologie, Paris, vol. 43 nº 1-2, p. 47-70.

Morsi A.M. & Wendler J.E. (2010).- Biostratigraphy, palaeoecology and palaeogeography of the Middle Cenomanian-Early Turonian Levant Platform in Central Jordan based on ostracods. In: Homberg C. & Bachmann M. (eds.), Evolution of the Levant margin and Western Arabia platform since the Mesozoic.- Geological Society, Special Publication, London, vol. 341, p. 187-210.

Neufville E.M.H. (1973a).- Upper Cretaceous-Palaeogene Ostracoda from the South Atlantic.- Publications from the Palaeontological Institution of the University of Uppsala, 205 p.

Neufville E.M.H. (1973b).- Ostracoda from the Eze-Aku shale (Turonian, Cretaceous) Nkalagu, Nigeria.- Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala, vol. 4, p. 43-52.

Neufville E.M.H. (1979).- Upper Cretaceous-Paleogene marine ostracods from the Sergipe-Alagoas Basin, northeastern Brazil.- Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala, vol. 8, p. 135-172.

Okosun E.A. (1987).- Ostracod biostratigraphy of the Eastern Dahomey Basin, Niger Delta and the Benue Trough of Nigeria.- Geological Survey of Nigeria, Lagos, vol. 41, 151 p.

Okosun E.A. (1992).- Cretaceous ostracod biostratigraphy from Chad Basin in Nigeria.- Journal of African Earth Sciences, Oxford, vol. 14, p. 327-339.

Pessoa Neto O.C., Soares U.M., Silva J.G.F., Roesner E.H., Florencio C.P. & Souza C.A.V. (2007).- Bacia Potiguar.- Boletim de Geociências da Petrobras, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 15, nº 2, p. 357-387.

Piovesan E.K, Ballent S. & Fauth G. (2012).- Cretaceous palaeogeography of southern Gondwana from the distribution of the marine ostracod Majungaella Grekoff: New data and review.- Cretaceous Research, London, vol. 37, p. 127-147.

Piovesan E.K., Bergue C.T. & Fauth G. (2009).- Cretaceous ostracodes from Pará-Maranhão Basin, Brazil: taxonomy and preliminary paleoecological and paleobiogeographical inferences.- Revue de Paléobiologie, Genève, vol. 28, nº 2, p. 437-456.

Piovesan E.K., Cabral M.C., Colin J.-P., Fauth G. & Bergue C.T. (2014).- Ostracodes from the Upper Cretaceous of the Potiguar Basin, Northeastern Brazil: taxonomy, paleoecology and paleobiogeography, Part 1: Turonian.- Carnets de Géologie [Notebooks on Geology], Brest, vol. 14, nº 12, p. 211-252.

Pletsch T., Erbacher J., Holbourn A.E.L., Kuhnt W., Moullade M., Oboh-Ikuenobede F.E., Söding E. & Wagner T. (2001).- Cretaceous separation of Africa and South America: the view from the West African margin (ODP Leg 159).- Journal of South American Earth Sciences, Oxford, vol. 14, p. 147-174.

Puckett T.M. (2002).- Systematics and paleobiogeography of brachycytherine Ostracoda.- Micropaleontology, New York, vol. 48, (suppl. 2), 87 p.

Puckett T.M., Colin J.-P. & Mitchell S. (2012).- New species and genera of Ostracoda from the Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) of Jamaica.- Micropaleontology, New York, vol. 58, nº 5, p. 397-455.

Reyment R.A. (1960).- Studies on Nigerian Upper Cretaceous and lower Tertiary Ostracoda: part 1. Senonian and Maastrichtian Ostracoda.- Stockholm Contributions in Geology, Stockholm, vol. 7, 238 p.

Reyment R.A. (1980).- Paleo-oceanology and paleobiogeography of the Cretaceous South Atlantic Ocean.- Oceanologica Acta, Paris, vol. 3, nº 1, p. 127-134.

Rosenfeld A. & Raab M. (1974).- Cenomanian-Turonian ostracods from the Judea Group in Israel.- Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Israel, Jerusalem, vol. 62, 64 p.

Seeling J., Colin J.-P. & Fauth G. (2004).- Global Campanian (Upper Cretaceous) ostracod palaeobiogeography.- Palæogeography, Palæoclimatology, Palæoecology, Amsterdam, vol. 213, nº 3-4, p. 379-398.

Shahin A. (1991).- Cenomanian-Turonian ostracodes from Gabal Nezzazat, southwestern Sinai, Egypt, with observation on δC13 values and the Cenomanian/Turonian boundary.- Journal of Paleontolology, Ithaca, vol. 10, nº 2, p. 133-150.

Smith A.G., Smith D.G. & Funnel B.M. (1994).- Atlas of Mesozoic and Cenozoic coastlines.- Cambridge University Press, 99 p.

Swain F.M. & Brown P.M. (1964).- Cretaceous ostracoda from wells in the southeastern United States.- Bulletin of North Carolina Department of Conservation and Development, Raleigh, vol. 78, p. 1-55.

Tambareau Y. (1982).- Les Ostracodes et l'histoire géologique de l'Atlantique Sud au Crétacé.- Bulletin des Centres de Recherches Exploration-Production elf Aquitaine, Pau, vol. 6, p. 1-37.

Tibert N., Colin J.-P., Leckie R.M. & Babinot J.-F. (2003).- Revision of the ostracode genus Fossocytheridea Swain & Brown, 1964: Mesozoic ancestral root for the modern eurytopic Cyprideis Jones.- Micropaleontology, New York, vol. 49, p. 205-230.

Tibert N., Colin J.-P. & Leckie R.M. (2009).- Taxonomy, biostratigraphy and paleoecology of Cenomanian and Turonian ostracodes from the Western Interior Basin, Southwest Utah, USA.- Revue de Micropaléontologie, Paris, vol. 52, p. 85-106.

Tibert N., Leckie R.M., Eaton J.G., Kirkland J.I., Colin J.-P., Eithold E. & Mccormick M.E. (2002).- Recognition of relative sea-level change in Upper Cretaceous coal-bearing strata: a paleoecological approach using agglutinated foraminifera and ostracodes to detect key stratigraphic surfaces. In: Olson H. & Leckie R.M. (eds.), Micropaleontologic proxies for sea level change and stratigraphic discontinuities.- SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology), Special Publication, Tulsa, nº 75, p. 263-299.

Titterton R. & Whatley R.C. (1988).- The provincial distribution of shallow water Indo-Pacific marine ostracoda: origins, antiquity, dispersal routes and mechanisms. In: Hanai T., Ikeya N. & Ishizaki K. (eds.), Evolutionary biology of Ostracodes. Its fundamentals and applications.- Development in Palaeontology and Stratigraphy, Amsterdam, 11, p. 759-786.

Vivière J.L. (1985).- Les Ostracodes du Crétacé supérieur (Vraconien à Campanien basal) de la région de Tébessa (Algérie du Nord-Est) : Stratigraphie, paléoécologie, systématique.- PhD thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 261 p.

Viviers M.C., Koutsoukos E.A.M., Silva-Telles Jr A.C. & Bengtson P. (2000).- Stratigraphy and biogeographic affinities of the Late Aptian-Campanian ostracods of the Potiguar and Sergipe basins in northeastern Brazil.- Cretaceous Research, London, vol.  21, p. 407-455.

Whatley R.C. & Cusminsky G. (2010).- Semicytherura Wagner: its inner lamella and its close allies.- Journal of Micropalaeontology, London, vol. 29, p. 1-4.

Whatley R.C., Pyne R.S. & Wilkinson I.P. (2003).- Ostracoda and palaeo-oxygen levels, with particular reference to the Upper Cretaceous of East Anglia.- Palæogeography, Palæoclimatology, Palæoecology, Amsterdam, vol. 194, p. 355-386.