◄ Carnets Geol. 18 (6) ►
Outline:
[I. Introduction]
[II. Paleontological and systematic study]
[III. Conclusion]
[Bibliographic references] and ...
[Plate]
6, rue Frédéric Mistral, 26200 Montélimar (France);
Centre d'Études Méditerranéennes, 04170 St-André-lès-Alpes (France)
Département des Sciences de la Terre, Université de Nice-Sophia-Antipolis,
Faculté des Sciences, 28 avenue Valrose, 06108 Nice Cedex 2 (France);
Centre d'Études Méditerranéennes, 04170 St-André-lès-Alpes (France)
7, impasse du Clos, 04200 Peipin (France)
Chemin de Dardène, La Barthelasse, 84000 Avignon (France);
Centre d'Études Méditerranéennes, 04170 St-André-lès-Alpes (France)
Published online in final form (pdf) on May 18, 2018
DOI 10.4267/2042/66955
[Editor: Bruno Granier;
language editor: Stephen Carey]
The species Heteroceras gracile sp. nov. is described; it is a small and slender species, with a small helix and hamuliniform morphology, previously considered as an atypical variant of Heteroceras baylei (Reynès, 1876). In southeast France, it is mainly known in the Morteiron section (Alpes de Haute-Provence, France), but the species is also present in Bulgaria and possibly in Japan.
• Ammonoidea;
• upper Barremian;
• Heteroceras;
• Alpes de Haute-Provence;
• France
Baudouin C., Delanoy G., Bournaud G. & Gonnet R. (2018).- Heteroceras gracile sp. nov., a new species of Heteroceras Orbigny, 1849, from the upper Barremian of Morteiron (Alpes de Haute-Provence, France).- Carnets Geol., Madrid, vol. 18, no. 6, p. 155-165.
Heteroceras gracile sp. nov., une espèce nouvelle d'Heteroceras Orbigny, 1849, du Barrémien supérieur de Morteiron (Alpes de Haute-Provence, France).- L'espèce Heteroceras gracile sp. nov. est créée ; elle est représentée par des formes de petite taille, à enroulement frêle et petit turricône, de morphologie hamuliniforme, précédemment considérées comme des morphes atypiques d'Heteroceras baylei (Reynès, 1876). Dans le sud-est de la France, elle est essentiellement connue dans la coupe de Morteiron (Alpes de Haute-Provence, France), mais l'espèce est aussi présente en Bulgarie et hypothétiquement au Japon.
• Ammonoidea ;
• Barrémien supérieur ;
• Heteroceras ;
• Alpes de Haute-Provence ;
• France
The genus Heteroceras Orbigny, 1849, includes forms of very diverse size, from a few centimeters for the species Heteroceras baylei (Reynès, 1876), H. elegans Rouchadzé, 1933, H. eristavii Kakabadze, 1975, and H. veratiae Frau et al., 2016, to 60 cm or more in Heteroceras coulleti Delanoy, 1995. The small forms of southeast France have been the subject of several recent studies (Delanoy & Bulot, 1990; Delanoy, 1997; Delanoy & Bert, 2006; Frau et al., 2016). The existence in bed no. 3 of the Morteiron section (Alpes de Haute-Provence, France) of a population of small individuals with hamuliniform morphology and bearing a long and slender proversum, was described by Delanoy (1997, p. 98). It was then considered as a variant of Heteroceras baylei (Reynès, 1876), and linked to particular ecological conditions. The collection and study of new specimens showed, however, very marked morphological differences with Heteroceras baylei (Reynès, 1876), including slender coiling, with a long proversum and a relatively short retroversum that is not in contact with the helix, leading us to consider this population as a distinct species.
The biozonation scheme of the Lower Cretaceous employed here (Fig. 1 ) is the one developed by the IUGS Lower Cretaceous Ammonite Working Group (Reboulet et al., 2011, 2014). We retain the tripartite division of the Imerites giraudi Zone at the top of the Barremian (Bert et al., 2008, 2011; Reboulet et al., 2011).
Figure 1:
Biozonation of the Barremian (according to Bert et
al., 2008, 2011, and Reboulet et
al., 2011, 2014). |
All the specimens studied in this work come from the Morteiron section (Fig. 2 ), located in the commune of Saint-Étienne-lès-Orgues (Alpes de Haute-Provence, France). The important Heteroceratidae fauna of this section was first reported by Kilian (1889) and described in detail by Delanoy (1997), Delanoy & Ebbo (2000) and Delanoy & Bert (2006). Two levels in particular are remarkable for the diversity and abundance of the representatives of this family: bed no. 3, with Heteroceras emericianum Orbigny, 1842, and its morphotypes, H. gracile sp. nov. (= H. baylei (Reynès, 1876) in Delanoy, 1997), Rouchadzeites mascarellii (Delanoy & Ebbo, 2000), Egoianites mikhaili Delanoy & Bert, 2006, Paraimerites ? sp., Argvethites sp., and bed no. β, with Heteroceras emericianum Orbigny, 1842, H. moulladei Delanoy & Bert, 2006, H. gracile sp. nov., H. gonneti Delanoy, 1997, H. baylei ? (Reynès, 1876) and several forms of Heteroceras sp. which will be the subject of a future study.
Figure
2:
Geographical location of the studied section (source: www.geoportail.gouv.fr). |
The terminology of the different parts of the shell is the one used by Frau et al. (2016, Fig. 4).
The measurements (Fig. 3 and Tab. 1) were carried out according to the protocol employed by Delanoy (1997, p. 18, fig. 2 and p. 26) for the measurements N (ribbing density), and Cp and Cc (growth rate). On incomplete specimens, measurement H corresponds to the height of the preserved part of the shell. The h2 measurement was performed at the last suture if it was visible. If the last suture is not visible, h2 was measured at the top of the proversum, at the level where the boundary between the phragmocone and the body chamber is usually observed. In order to allow the calculation of the growth rates Cp and Cc on the maximum number of specimens, where h1 or h3 are not measurable (incomplete specimens), additional measurements h1* or h3* (as well as the lp* and lc* lengths of the corresponding shell segments) were carried out, corresponding respectively to the lowest measurable whorl height on the phragmocone and to the highest measurable whorl height on the body chamber.
Figure
3:
Explanatory diagram of the measurements made on the specimens
studied. |
Table 1: Abbreviations used in the text.
H | Total length |
L | Total width |
Dt | Turricone diameter |
h1 | Whorl height at the end of the turricone |
h1* | Whorl height at the base of the preserved part of the proversum (when h1 is not measurable) |
h2 | Whorl height at the last suture |
h3 | Whorl height at the end of the body chamber |
h3* | Whorl height at the end of the preserved part of the body chamber (when h3 is not measurable) |
lp | Length of the phragmocone (without the turricone) |
lp* | Length of the preserved part of the phragmocone (when lp is not measurable) |
lc | Length of the body chamber |
lc* | Length of the preserved part of the body chamber (when lc is not measurable) |
Cp | Relative growth in whorl height of the phragmocone: Cp = (h2 – h1)÷lp (or of the preserved part of the phragmocone when it is incomplete: Cp = (h2 – h1*)÷lp*) |
Cc | Relative growth in whorl height of the body chamber: Cp = (h3 – h1)÷lc (or of the preserved part of the body chamber when it is incomplete: Cp = (h3* – h1)÷lc*) |
N | Number of ventral ribs belonging to a longitudinal interval of length h, where h is the whorl height in the middle of this interval |
Suborder Ancyloceratina Wiedmann, 1966
Superfamily Ancyloceratoidea Gill, 1871
Family Heteroceratidae Spath, 1922
Genus Heteroceras Orbigny, 1849
(= Lindigia Karsten, 1858; Atopoceras Jaubert in Kilian, 1889, nomen nudum; Hemibaculites Hyatt, 1900, nomen dubium; ? Dirrymoceras Hyatt, 1900, nomen dubium; Colchidites Djanélidzé, 1926; ? Santandericeras Royo y Gomez, 1945)
Type species: Turrilites emericianus Orbigny, 1842 (by subsequent designation of Meek, 1876, p. 477).
Heteroceras gracile sp. nov.
? | 1964 | Anahamulina subcylindrica (Orbigny, 1850). - Nikolov, p. 126, Pl. 4, fig. 6; non Pl. 5, figs. 1-2 (= Heteroceras sp.) |
? | 1976 | Acrioceras (?) aff. julivertii Etayo-Serna, 1968. - Obata & Ogawa, Pl. 4, fig. 6 |
1989 | Heteroceras cf. elegans Rouchadzé, 1933. - Conte, p. 39, fig. 9 ?, 10 ?, 11 | |
pars | 1997 | Heteroceras baylei (Reynès, 1876). - Delanoy, p. 95, Pl. 13, fig. 4; Pl. 16, fig. 3; Pl. 20, figs. 3-4; Pl. 50, fig. 3; non Pl. 9, fig. 3; Pl. 13, fig. 5; Pl. 14, figs. 4-7; Pl. 20, fig. 2; Pl. 50, figs. 4, 8; Pl. 51, figs. 2-8 [=Heteroceras baylei (Reynès, 1876)] |
2013 | Heteroceras baylei (Reynès, 1876). - Ivanov & Idakieva, fig. 6.E ?, F-G |
Holotype: Specimen no. FSL13388, coll. Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France. Examination of the matrix indicates that the holotype comes from bed no. 3 of the Morteiron section (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France).
Derivatio nominis: In reference to the slender and hamuliniform character of this new species.
Locus-typicus: Morteiron, Saint-Étienne-lès-Orgues (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France).
Stratum-typicum: Upper Barremian, Imerites giraudi Zone, Imerites giraudi Subzone, Heteroceras emericianum Horizon.
Geographical and stratigraphical distribution: H. gracile sp. nov. is mainly known in the Heteroceras emericianum Horizon of the Morteiron section (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France), more precisely in beds no. 3 and β (Delanoy, 1997, p. 255).
H. gracile sp. nov. also appears to be present in Bulgaria in the Heteroceras astierianum Zone of Nikolov (1964, Pl. 4, fig. 6). Its presence seems certain at the base of the Martelites sarasini Subzone of the Opaka section (Ivanov & Idakieva, 2013, p. 55 and Fig. 6).
Its presence in Japan is still hypothetical and is based on the morphological affinities between Acrioceras (?) aff. julivertii Etayo-Serna, 1968, figured by Obata & Ogawa (1976, Pl. 4, fig. 6) and H. gracile sp. nov.
Material and dimensions (N=29): Specimens no. FSL13388, coll. Claude Bernard University (Lyon, France), mot02, mot03, mot04, mot05, mot06, mot07a, mot07b, mot09, mot10, mot11, mot12, mot13, mot14, mot16, mot17, mot18, mot19, mot20, coll. Baudouin, 28824, 28838, 28839, 28840, coll. Delanoy, MOT GBD 01, MOT GBD 02, coll. Bournaud, bed no. 3, upper Barremian, Imerites giraudi Zone, Imerites giraudi Subzone, Heteroceras emericianum Horizon, Morteiron, Saint-Étienne-lès-Orgues (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France); no. RG419a, RG419b, coll. Baudouin leg. Gonnet, bed no. β, upper Barremian, Imerites giraudi Zone, Imerites giraudi Subzone, Heteroceras emericianum Horizon, Morteiron, Saint-Étienne-lès-Orgues (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France); no. MOT GBD 03, MOT GBD 06, coll. Bournaud, bed no. β ?, upper Barremian, Imerites giraudi Zone, Imerites giraudi Subzone, Heteroceras emericianum Horizon, Morteiron, Saint-Étienne-lès-Orgues (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France). See Tables 2 and 3 for dimensions.
The holotype no. FSL13388 and specimens no. 28839 and no. 28840, as well as casts of specimens no. mot09 and no. mot10 (registered as UCBL-FSL 391837 and UCBL-FSL 391838) are deposited in the collections of the Claude Bernard University, Lyon 1 of Villeurbanne (France).
Table 2: Morphometric measurements of Heteroceras gracile sp. nov.
no. | "H" | L | h1 | h1* | h2 | h3 | h3* | Dt | lp | lp* | lc | lc* | Cp | Cc |
FSL13388 | 65.9 | 24.5 | 3.8 | - | 8.2 | 13.7 | - | 4.8 | 58.3 | - | 48.4 | - | 7.5 | 11.4 |
mot02 | 50.9 | - | - | 3.9 | 8.2 | - | - | - | - | 39.6 | - | - | 10.9 | - |
mot03 | 59.6 | 24.3 | - | 4.3 | 8 | 12.3 | - | - | - | 47.8 | 30.2 | - | 7.7 | 14.2 |
mot04 | 57.3 | 23.2 | - | 2.9 | 7.8 | 13.9 | - | - | - | 48.3 | 49.7 | - | 10.1 | 12.3 |
mot05 | 51.4 | 20.7 | - | 4.6 | 7.2 | - | 11.6 | - | - | 39.6 | - | 29.5 | 6.6 | 14.9 |
mot06 | 55.5 | - | - | 4.7 | 7.7 | - | - | - | - | 39.6 | - | - | 7.6 | - |
mot07a | 80 | 29.5 | - | 5.2 | 9.7 | 16.2 | - | - | - | 60.3 | 34.9 | - | 7.5 | 18.6 |
mot07b | 69.3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
mot09 | 83.3 | 28.2 | 3.5 | - | 10.7 | 15.5 | - | - | 75.2 | - | 51.5 | - | 9.6 | 9.3 |
mot10 | 59 | - | 4.1 | - | c9.8 | - | - | c8.1 | 52 | - | - | - | 11.0 | - |
mot11 | 56.9 | 25.1 | - | 4.1 | 7.8 | 16.2 | - | - | - | 42.8 | 44.3 | - | 8.6 | 19.0 |
mot12 | 72.6 | 36.4 | - | 6.4 | 10.2 | 18.4 | - | - | - | 58.3 | 48.2 | - | 6.5 | 17.0 |
mot13 | 45.3 | 27.9 | - | 5.2 | 7.4 | 15.4 | - | - | - | 38.4 | 50.9 | - | 5.7 | 15.7 |
mot14 | 67.9 | 23.4 | - | 5.3 | 9.1 | - | - | - | - | 45 | - | - | 8.4 | - |
mot16 | 55.3 | 24.5 | - | 6.6 | 8.5 | 13.8 | - | - | - | 37.3 | 63 | - | 5.1 | 8.4 |
mot17 | 56.7 | 28.3 | - | 6 | 9.1 | 13.7 | - | - | - | 42.3 | 44.9 | - | 7.3 | 10.2 |
mot18 | 34.4 | 26 | - | - | 7.9 | 12.8 | - | - | - | - | 42.1 | - | - | 11.6 |
mot19 | 49.6 | 21.6 | - | 4.8 | 7.6 | 12.3 | - | - | - | 39.6 | 47.5 | - | 7.1 | 9.9 |
mot20 | 50.9 | 27.6 | - | 3.9 | 6.7 | 13.4 | - | - | - | 42.6 | 49 | - | 6.6 | 13.7 |
RG419a | 62.9 | 23.9 | 4.2 | - | 7.6 | 11.6 | - | - | 51.2 | - | 50.3 | - | 6.6 | 8.0 |
RG419b | 55.8 | 20 | - | - | 6.7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
MOT GDB 01 | 58.4 | 23.5 | - | 7 | 9.3 | - | 11.8 | - | - | 42.2 | - | 29.8 | 5.5 | 8.4 |
MOT GDB 02 | 65.6 | 25.3 | 3.4 | - | 8 | c13 | - | 9.4 | 53.5 | - | 50.1 | - | 8.6 | 10.0 |
MOT GDB 03 | 46.7 | 25.2 | - | 5.5 | 8.4 | 14.9 | - | - | - | 34.1 | 57 | - | 8.5 | 11.4 |
MOT GDB 06 | 37.5 | 16.8 | - | 3.4 | 5.3 | 9.6 | - | - | - | 31 | 43.2 | - | 6.1 | 10.0 |
22839 | 55 | 21.9 | - | 5 | 8.6 | - | 10.8 | - | - | 37.7 | - | 22.8 | 9.5 | 9.6 |
28840 | 61 | - | - | 6.6 | 10.4 | 17.1 | - | - | - | 45.8 | 46 | - | 8.3 | 14.6 |
Heteroceras baylei, holotype no. MHNM 1989-44 |
65.7 | - | - | 8.6 | 11.7 | 16.7 | - | - | - | 34.3 | 62 | - | 9.0 | 8.1 |
Heteroceras elegans, holotype no. GIT 350/1016 |
53.1 | 28 | 8.1 | - | 9.4 | 14.8 | - | 13.6 | 29.8 | - | 39.7 | - | 4.4 | 13.6 |
Heteroceras veratiae, holotype no. FCC.8A |
33 | - | 5.7 | - | 7.4 | 9 | - | 11 | 16.2 | - | 25.1 | 10.5 | 6.4 |
Table 3: Ribbing density measurements of Heteroceras gracile sp. nov. (Bold italic type indicates that these values were measured on photographs).
no. | |||||
FSL13388 | h | 4.2 | 6.3 | 8.6 | 13.7 |
N | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | |
mot02 | h | 6.4 | |||
N | 6 | ||||
mot03 | h | 4.6 | 6.5 | 8.5 | 11.8 |
N | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 | |
mot04 | h | 3.7 | 8.4 | 11.5 | |
N | 5 | 11 | 9 | ||
mot05 | h | 4 | 7.2 | 11.1 | |
N | 4 | 7 | 7 | ||
mot06 | h | 5.1 | 7.6 | ||
N | 5 | 6 | |||
mot07a | h | 4.9 | 8.2 | 10.7 | 14.9 |
N | 5 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
mot07b | h | 3.2 | 6.6 | ||
N | 3 | 6 | |||
mot09 | h | 4 | 6.1 | 10.7 | 13.2 |
N | 5 | 5 | 9 | 8 | |
mot10 | h | 4.4 | 5.5 | 8.8 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 6 | ||
mot11 | h | 5.2 | 7.2 | 14.4 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 7 | ||
mot12 | h | 7.5 | 10.9 | 17.3 | |
N | 7 | 9 | 10 | ||
mot13 | h | 8 | 14.2 | ||
N | 6 | 8 | |||
mot14 | h | 5.5 | 9.4 | 11.6 | |
N | 5 | 6 | 6 | ||
mot16 | h | 7.3 | 8.7 | 13.8 | |
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||
mot17 | h | 6.5 | 9.3 | 13.5 | |
N | 7 | 8 | 8 | ||
mot18 | h | 7.1 | 12.4 | ||
N | 5 | 6 | |||
mot19 | h | 5.1 | 7.2 | 11.7 | |
N | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
mot20 | h | 5.4 | 13 | ||
N | 5 | 8 | |||
RG419a | h | 4.6 | 7.4 | 12.6 | |
N | 6 | 8 | 7 | ||
RG419b | h | 11.2 | 10.6 | ||
N | 5 | 6 | |||
MOT GDB 01 | h | 6.8 | 9.2 | ||
N | 6 | 6 | |||
MOT GDB 02 | h | 3.4 | 7.6 | 12 | |
N | 4 | 6 | 8 | ||
MOT GDB 03 | h | 7.2 | 8.8 | 13.8 | |
N | 6 | 7 | 8 | ||
MOT GDB 06 | h | 3.6 | 5.3 | 9.2 | |
N | 4 | 5 | 7 | ||
28839 | h | 6.5 | 8 | 11 | |
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||
28840 | h | 7 | 10 | 16 | |
N | 6 | 7 | 9 | ||
Heteroceras baylei, holotype no. MHNM 1989-44 |
h | 9.3 | 16.7 | ||
N | 5 | 5 | |||
Heteroceras elegans, holotype no. GIT 350/1016 |
h | 8.5 | 9.3 | 14.9 | |
N | 5 | 6 | 6 | ||
Heteroceras veratiae, holotype no. FCC.8A |
h | 5.7 | 8.6 | ||
N | 5 | 6 |
Diagnosis: Small Heteroceras Orbigny, 1849, of hamuliniform morphology with a relatively slow growth rate, having a small helix, a long and thin proversum and a retroversum approximately half the length of the shell. The ribbing is very regular and consists of simple ribs on most of the shell, with bifurcated ribs present only on or near the flexus.
Description: Shell of small size and hamuliniform morphology. The whorl section, rarely visible in its entirety, appears to be subcircular to suboval, higher than wide. The helix, rarely preserved, is small, with whorls in contact and with both dextral (specimen no. mot10, Pl. 1 , fig. 4) and sinistral coiling (specimen no. FSL13388, Pl. 1 , fig. 6). The proversum is long, straight or slightly curved, with a relatively moderate whorl height growth (Cp between 5.7% and 11%). On specimens with visible sutures, the body chamber begins at the top of the proversum, at the junction with the flexus. The retroversum is straight, half to two thirds of the total length of the shell. Growth in whorl height is increasing, particularly on the flexus and the start of the retroversum, with a Cc growth rate of between 8% and 18%. The gap between the proversum and the retroversum is generally narrow, especially in specimens with straight proversum.
On the helix, the ribs are simple or sometimes bifurcated from the umbilical shoulder.
For most of the proversum, the ornamentation consists solely of straight, simple and regular, slightly prorsiradiate, more or less fine and dense ribs, N varying between 5 and 11 at whorl height h between 6 and 10 mm (Fig. 4 ). The ribs appear in the dorsal region where they can be relatively attenuated. During growth, the ribbing gradually strengthens, and, in the upper third of the proversum, bifurcated ribs appear, with the bifurcation point generally lying between the lower third and the middle of the flanks. The number of bifurcated ribs increases gradually.
Figure
4:
Ribbing density N in
function of h in Heteroceras gracile sp. nov. (see Table 2). |
On the flexus, the proportions of bifurcated and single ribs are highly variable; however, bifurcated ribs are most often predominant, with single ribs isolated and irregularly arranged, or even absent.
On the retroversum, the ribbing becomes even stronger and the ribs are then slightly rursiradiate, sometimes rectiradiate. It again consists mostly of simple ribs; bifurcated ribs, however, are present in the lower half of the retroversum where they may be dominant (specimen no. mot17, Pl. 1 , fig. 7).
The peristome is not preserved on any of the specimens studied. At the approach of the peristome, the rib pattern seems to become slightly prorsiradiate again (specimens no. mot04, Pl. 1 , fig. 1; no. mot09, Pl. 1 , fig. 3; no. RG419a, Pl. 1 , fig. 9).
Suture lines are difficult to observe in detail. They show, however, a relatively deep and feebly incised, trifid lateral lobe (specimen no. MOT GBD 02; Fig. 5 ).
Figure
5:
Detail of the suture line (lateral lobe) of Heteroceras gracile sp. nov. (specimen no. MOT GBD 02). |
Discussion and comparisons:
Heteroceras gracile sp. nov. is close to Heteroceras baylei (Reynès, 1876), of which it was considered a variant, and linked to particular ecological conditions by Delanoy (1997, p. 98). Heteroceras gracile sp. nov. is distinguished by its generally more hamuliniform and slender form, with a much longer proversum and a relatively short retroversum that never comes into contact with the helix, as well as by its much denser ribbing (Fig. 4 ).
Heteroceras gracile sp. nov. is also close to Heteroceras elegans Rouchadzé, 1933, whose type-specimens come from the upper Barremian ("Colchidites securiformis Zone", Kakabadze, 1975, p. 89) of Goresha (Georgia). Heteroceras gracile sp. nov. differs from it by its larger size and more slender morphology, with a significantly smaller helix and a much longer and thinner proversum, and by its denser ribbing (Fig. 4 ).
Heteroceras helicoceroides (Karsten, 1858) is a small form from the upper Barremian of Colombia, known only from the original picture of Karsten. This makes it difficult to establish the specific characteristics of this taxon, which appears to differ from Heteroceras gracile sp. nov. by its less slender morphology and the chevron-like ribbing on its ventral region.
Heteroceras vermiforme Rouchadzé, 1933, of the upper Barremian ("Colchidites securiformis Zone", Kakabadze, 1975, p. 90) of Georgia, is known only from its holotype, which has many similarities to Heteroceras gracile sp. nov., in particular, a rather long proversum and quite similar ribbing. The very incomplete state of this holotype, figured by Rouchadzé (1933, Pl. 13, fig. 5) and Kakabadze (1975, Pl. 3, fig. 6), makes it difficult to compare the two taxa; the general morphology of the Georgian species seems less slender than that of H. gracile sp. nov.
Heteroceras veratiae Frau et al., 2016, a species known only in the Martelites sarasini Subzone of Cape Croisette (Marseille, France), differs from Heteroceras gracile sp. nov. primarily in its much smaller size which does not exceed 38 mm, and its less slender morphology. Its proversum and retroversum are clearly divergent instead of subparallel.
The particular morphological characteristics of the specimens studied (slender and almost hamuliniform shell, long proversum and relatively short retroversum) justify the creation of the taxon Heteroceras gracile sp. nov. This new species makes it possible to complete the inventory of the genus Heteroceras Orbigny, 1849, particularly for small taxa. These still poorly known species are often difficult to characterize on the basis of incomplete and/or poorly stratigraphically located specimens, which preclude us from appreciating their great morphological diversity and establishing clear specific distinctions.
We would like to thank Emmanuel Robert (Codirector of Geological Collections, University Lyon 1, France) for his hospitality during our investigations of the collections of the Claude Bernard University, and both Keith P. Minor (University of Texas at Austin, USA) and Stephen Carey (Federation University, University of Ballarat, Australia) for the improvement of the English text. We also warmly thank our reviewers Miguel Company (Granada University, Spain) and Zdenĕk Vašiček (Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic) for their constructive remarks.
Bert D., Delanoy G. & Bersac S. (2008) - Nouveaux biohorizons et propositions pour le découpage biozonal ammonitique du Barrémien supérieur du Sud-Est de la France.- Carnets Geol., Madrid, vol. 8, no. A03 (CG2008_A03), 18 p.
Bert D., Delanoy G. & S. Bersac (2011) - The Dichotomus Horizon: Proposal for a new biochronologic unit of the Giraudi Zone of the Upper Barremian of southeastern France, and considerations regarding the genus Imerites Rouchadzé (Ammonoidea, Gassendiceratinae).- Carnets Geol., Madrid, vol. 11, no. A01 (CG2011_A01), 12 p.
Conte G. (1989) - Fossiles du plateau d'Albion.- Les Alpes de Lumière, Forcalquier, no. 99, 75 p.
Delanoy G. (1997) - Biostratigraphie des faunes d'ammonites à la limite Barrémien-Aptien dans la région d'Angles-Barrême-Castellane. Étude particulière de la Famille des Heteroceratidae Spath, 1922 (Ancyloceratina, Ammonoidea).- Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle de Nice, t. XII, 270 p.
Delanoy G. & Bert D. (2006) - Nouvelles unités taxonomiques de la Famille des Heteroceratidae Spath, 1924.- Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle de Nice, t. XXI, p. 255-295.
Delanoy G. & Bulot L.G. (1990) - Révision des types et figures des collections Matheron et Reynès 3. Genres: Acrioceras, Heteroceras, Kutatissites et Pseudocrioceras (Ancyloceratina, Cephalopoda).- Mésogée, Marseille, vol. 50, p. 15-21.
Delanoy G. & Ebbo L. (2000) - Une nouvelle espèce d'Heteroceras: H. mascarelli sp. nov. (Ancyloceratina, Ammonoidea) dans le Barrémien du SE de la France.- Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle de Nice, t. XV, p. 1-17.
Frau C., Delanoy G., Masse J.-P., Lanteaume C. & Tendil A.J.B. (2016) - New Heteroceratidae (Ammonoidea) from the late Barremian deepening succession of Marseille (Bouches-du-Rhône, France).- Acta Geologica Polonica, Warszawa, vol. 66, no. 2, p. 205-225.
Ivanov M. & Idakieva V. (2013) - Lower Aptian ammonite biostratigraphy and potential for further studies of OAE 1a in Bulgaria.- Cretaceous Research, vol. 39, p. 47-69.
Kakabadze M.V. (1975) - Lower Cretaceous heteroceratids of Georgia and adjacent regions.- Trudy geologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk GSSR (new series), Tbilissi, vol. 47, p. 62-131.
Karsten H. (1858) - Über die geognostischen Verhältnisse des Westlichen Colombien der heutigen Republiken Neu Granada und Ecuador.- Amtlicher Bericht über Versammlung Deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte zu Wien, vol. 32, p. 80-117.
Kilian W. (1889) - Description géologique de la Montagne du Lure (Basses-Alpes).- Masson, Paris, 458 p.
Meek F.B. (1876) - A report on the invertebrate Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils of the Upper Missouri Country.- Report of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories, Washington, vol. IX, 629 p.
Nikolov T.G. (1964) - Barremian ammonites from north-eastern Bulgaria.- Travaux sur la Géologie de Bulgarie (série paléontologie), Sofia, vol. 6, p. 117-141.
Obata I. & Ogawa Y. (1976) - Ammonites Biostratigraphy of the Cretaceous Arida Formation, Wakayama Prefecture.- Bulletin of the National Science Museum (series C), Tokyo, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 93-110.
Orbigny A. d' (1840-1842) - Paléontologie française, description zoologique et géologique de tous les animaux mollusques et rayonnés fossiles de France. Terrains Crétacés, Vol. I. Céphalopodes.- Masson, Paris, 662 p.
Reboulet S., Rawson P.F., Moreno-Bedmar J.A., Aguirre-Urreta M.B., Barragán R., Bogomolov Y., Company M., González-Arreola C., Idakieva Stoyanova V., Lukeneder A., Matrion B., Mitta V., Randrianaly H., Vašíček Z., Baraboshkin E.J., Bert D., Bersac S., Bogdanova T.N., Bulot L.G., Latil J.-L., Mikhailova I.A., Ropolo P. & Szives O. (2011) - Report on the 4th International Meeting of the IUGS Lower Cretaceous Ammonite Working Group, the "Kilian Group" (Dijon, France, 30th August 2010).- Cretaceous Research, vol. 32, p. 786-793.
Reboulet S., Szives O., Aguirre-Urreta B., Barragán R., Company M., Idakieva V., Ivanov M., Kakabadze M.V., Moreno-Bedmar J.A., Sandoval J., Baraboshkin E.J., Çağlar M.K., Főzy I., González-Arreola C., Kenjo S., Lukeneder A., Raisossadat S.N., Rawson P.F. & Tavera J.M. (2014) - Report on the 5th International Meeting of the IUGS Lower Cretaceous Ammonite Working Group, the Kilian Group (Ankara, Turkey, 31st August 2013).- Cretaceous Research, vol. 50, p. 126-137.
Rouchadzé J. (1933) - Les Ammonites aptiennes de la Géorgie occidentale.- Bulletin de l'Institut géologique de Géorgie, Tbilissi, vol. I, fasc. 3, p. 165-273.
Plate 1: All
specimens are from Morteiron, Saint-Étienne-lès-Orgues
(Alpes de Haute-Provence, France). |